[gha] Re: Shouting for Peace?
- From: ammar banni <ammarbanni@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 08:14:44 +0100 (BST)
Dear friends,colleagues
What is an organization which works for peace ?
I think that peace education is therefore instrument for the individual to
enable him to live in harmony with himself, with society and with
nature. It is a process and a condition resulting from the exercise of a
democratic and pluralistic citizenship inspired human rights -oriented
sustainable development.
This organization is founded for an instrument of peace to play the following
key roles :
it must be for the service of humanity
it is open to all members of the way of understanding
it must learn respect for life and human beings
it must teach tolerance and must develop in its members a sense of
responsibility
it must learn its members to overcome selfishness
These fundamental roles in the member in the construction of peace is also
explicitly stated in the preamble of UNESCO " war begin in the minds of
men, it is in the minds of men that must be the defenses of peace. " this motto
is a guide that should inspire
the organization for a true education in peace through the exercise of
citizenship to these members. , And to do this organization must socialize the
broadest sense ,
fighting against discrimination in , we must learn to live together in
mutual respect and common rules in order to promote the values of
justice, tolerance, solidarity , the virtues of dialogue , exemplary (action) .
While it is clear that we can not teach democracy in a democratic framework,
that human rights can only flourish in a state of law, it is important
that the organization which includes various activities, associations , the
role of its members, the projects initiated by each of them, the
resource, the smooth running of the organime its various plans and
curriculum which means all components generally include the organization
prescriptive texts are imbued with the principles of human rights . rights of
man
must live in the body and other structures such as relations with other
associations and it must afford to live the values learned , thus linking
theory with practice . organization should focus on its members
connected to the reality of everyday life, and based on collaboration
and cooperation.
Although I am only a humble member of the GHA , I found that the president does
not meet these basic which are the golden rule of the constitution
of an association.
Despite the vast knowledge he has , I think he lacks " knowledge -practice " .
For these reasons, I end my participation in GHA and I remain on good terms
with the other members .
Frankly , I have taken this decision of my own likings , after long hesitation
, but the day has come to take it.
with love and peace.
Ammar Banni/Professor of education _Author -poet/Algeria
________________________________
De : "Bruce Cook, AuthorMe.com" <cookcomm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
À : "gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé le : Vendredi 30 août 2013 14h27
Objet : [gha] Shouting for Peace?
Hello Leo, everyone,
Leo, It's regrettable that this conversation must be public, but the problem
has been there for all of us to see. So, at risk of joining others who have
suffered the wrath of Leo, I will respond to your public challenge.
The problem does not have to do with a typeface or style. I wish that was all
we are dealing with.
The problem is not cultural. American people are not that much different from
Russian people, and I have great respect for Russian culture. I even teach in a
school that originated in St. Petersburg, and I am proud of its leaders and
founders.
The problem is, occasionally you show amazing disrespect for your fellow peace
workers. When peace workers work together for peace, they adopt a professional
attitude of mutual respect. If they start criticizing each other in public,
their behavior is no different from the leaders who escalate in terms of
weapons and threats, or even the problem faced by the Zooks and Yooks in The
Butter Battle Book from Dr. Seuss.
Yes, we need to adopt a critical mindset when we help each other improve our
suggestions for peace, as we would for any academic discussion. Surely we are
free to do that. It is one thing to criticize someone directly, one to one, in
an e-mail. That is fine. But when a leader sends copies of every criticism to
200 colleagues, something is terribly wrong. This clearly works against our
purpose as peace workers.
In answer to your question on shouting - to shout is to put down, in public, a
faithful UN worker. To shout is to belittle, in public, highly respected peace
workers like Robert Crane, Norman Kurland, and now Charles Merieca (who is now
enduring a terrific work schedule in preparation for a major peace conference
in Malaysia). In the latter case, a few days ago, you say to him, in public...
"Similarly, for Charles Mercieca, who spared no time for endless mailing petty
information, but can not find one hour..."
Please stop telling us how petty and noncultural we are as peace workers. Don't
beat us over the head by suggesting that the only solution for peace is a
sociological study. (Or a contest among peace workers, judged by yourself.)
But, above all, please work with us as colleagues of equal status. Peace
workers are too little heard in the world today, and we desperately need to
work together. Just look what is happening in Syria.
Thanks, everyone, for your kind understanding.
With respect for all,
Yours in harmony,
Bruce
Bruce L. Cook, Ph.D.
President, GHA-USA
Vice-President, GHA
Director of CSSS Publishing and Editorial team
President, World Writers
Resources, Inc.
Author, Harmony of Nations: 1943 – 2020, Just Fiction Editions, 2012
1407 Getzelman Drive
Elgin, IL 60123 USA
312-859-8090
cookcomm@xxxxxxxxx
www.harmonyofnations.com
http://author-me.com
http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=544
________________________________
From: Leo Semashko <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Bruce Cook <cookcomm@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 4:11 AM
Subject: [gha] Re: (peace from harmony) Re: Re: Yalta Invitation 2013 - WHAT IS
YOUR CHOICE?
Re: (peace from harmony) Re: [gha] Re: Yalta Invitation 2013 - WHAT IS YOUR
CHOICE?
Dear Bruce,
Please allow us to be tolerant and patient mutually.
We belong to different cultures. I tell you honestly and frankly, without
hypocrisy: I do not like much in American culture and in the American people,
but I am patient them and tolerant to them. I understand that you also do not
like much in the Russian culture and the Russian people. But I call you to be
tolerant and patient.
What do you name a shout? - Underlined words? - But it is common practice to
strengthen the most important words of any texts in our culture, as in many
others. Do you agree that without patience and tolerance we can not achieve
peace and harmony? Or do you want the whole world lived under American rules?
With love, best harmony wishes,
Leo
Dr Leo Semashko:
State Councillor of St. Petersburg,
Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony;
Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia;
Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA);
Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org
Global Peace Science from Harmony: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=582;
World Interfaith Harmony Project on the ABC of Harmony Base:
www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=541;
GHA Program Book, The ABC of Harmony for World Peace:
www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478;
GHA Peace Video: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA;
My Web page: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253;
Address: 7/4-42 Ho-Shi-Min Street, St. Petersburg 194356, Russia
Phone: 7 (812) 597-65-71; Skype: leo.semahko
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/leo.semashko?ref=tn_tnmn
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Cook, cookcomm@xxxxxxxxx
To: leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: 29 августа 2013 г., 19:31:28
Subject: (peace from harmony) Re: [gha] Re: Yalta Invitation 2013 - WHAT IS
YOUR CHOICE?
Leo,
I do. Sure a peacemaker is allowed to shout at his colleagues. Go ahead.
Not sure the colleagues will respect a peacemaker.
In love and harmony,
Bruce
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Leo Semashko <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Bruce,
It was a criticism. Do you acknowledge criticism and freedom of speech?
Thank you for your understanding.
With love, best harmony wishes,
Leo
Dr Leo Semashko:
State Councillor of St. Petersburg,
Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony;
Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia;
Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA);
Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org
Global Peace Science from Harmony: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=582;
World Interfaith Harmony Project on the ABC of Harmony Base:
www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=541;
GHA Program Book, The ABC of Harmony for World Peace:
www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478;
GHA Peace Video: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA;
My Web page: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253;
Address: 7/4-42 Ho-Shi-Min Street, St. Petersburg 194356, Russia
Phone: 7 (812) 597-65-71; Skype: leo.semahko
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/leo.semashko?ref=tn_tnmn
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Cook, cookcomm@xxxxxxxxx
To: leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: 29 августа 2013 г., 15:21:23
Subject: (peace from harmony) Re: [gha] Re: Yalta Invitation 2013 - WHAT IS
YOUR CHOICE?
Leo,
Sorry to comment, but tough language among peacemakers fails to support the
purpose. Best to avoid sending a message when feelings are so high.
Thanks for your understanding,
Bruce
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Leo Semashko <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My dear old friend Rudolf Siebert,
We read your wonderful information for the tenth time! It may be enough?
It may be better to write a letter to President Putin as President of the G20
Summit on 5-6 September in St. Petersburg at address: info@xxxxxxxxxxxx with
the support of Global Peace Science (GPS)? Without this science can not be any
interfaith harmony and any harmony between fundamentalism and secularism that
is the main theme of your wonderful workshop in wonderful Crimea in the
wonderful 12th time.
Do you support GPS or you reject it? You are the first “World Harmony Creator”
in the GHA since 2007
(www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=513). GHA hopes that you will justify
this high trust and this GHA highest honorary title and will support GPS in
your any letter to Pres. Putin. More than 10 sample letters for it you can find
here: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=582. I think it will be more
useful waste of your expensive time than on endless mailing your ads.
Similarly, for Charles Mercieca, who spared no time for endless mailing petty
information, but can not find one hour to write a letter to Putin to support
GPS, as if he is indifferent to the peace science, hence, to world peace, to
which he devoted nearly 50 years of life. But what they are without the support
of a fundamental instrument of modern peace - without the Global Peace Science?
Please let us be consistent peacemakers and to be at the level of global peace
of 2013, which requires fundamental science and without which it will die in a
womb still unborn. Or are you waiting for permission and invitation of our
governments that nurture global war by the trillions of their budgets? Without
our hard remind them of global peace and its science, they never remember about
it.
So, we have an alternative: either we are waiting silently and cowardly death
of world peace, or we justify our peacekeeping mission and raise our voices in
its defense through creation of the Global Peace Science. It is an ethical
choice before us: that we prefer? The first choice will be late cross on the
grave of traditional peacekeeping, which degenerated into chaos of small,
insignificant, fragmented and spontaneous peacekeeping efforts.
The second choice will be the germ of a fundamentally new peacekeeping, on the
basis of uniting all peacekeepers SCIENCE OF GLOBAL PEACE as peace mind of
humanity in the 21st century!
What choice will make each of us for the rest week before the G20 Summit?
With love, best harmony wishes,
Leo
Dr Leo Semashko:
State Councillor of St. Petersburg,
Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony;
Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia;
Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA);
Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org
Global Peace Science from Harmony: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=582;
World Interfaith Harmony Project on the ABC of Harmony Base:
www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=541;
GHA Program Book, The ABC of Harmony for World Peace:
www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478;
GHA Peace Video: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA;
My Web page: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253;
Address: 7/4-42 Ho-Shi-Min Street, St. Petersburg 194356, Russia
Phone: 7 (812) 597-65-71; Skype: leo.semahko
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/leo.semashko?ref=tn_tnmn
----- Original Message -----
From: rsieb3@xxxxxxx, rsieb3@xxxxxxx
To: leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: 29 августа 2013 г., 4:15:18
Subject: [gha] Re: Yalta Invitation 2013
-----Original Message-----
From: maryluz sandoval <maryluzsandoval@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: gha <gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Aug 28, 2013 7:08 pm
Subject: [gha] Re: TR: PROBLEMATIQUES SOCIETALES DE NOTRE TEMPS !
Dear Ammar hi, I am so sorry to hear that you feel sick. I have been so busy
here and I just have time to replay your message today. I hope that you feel
much better now. Please take care of your health and I think that when we feel
in that way, we need to change various dimensions of our lives: food for
example (less salt, less sugar, less bread, less oil, more fruits and
vegetables), try to do some soft exercise (walking) and have more relax, less
stress, less work, less travelling, more restting at home.
I wish you feel better, I send to you very positive energy;
Mary Luz
________________________________
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:31:16 +0100
From: ammarbanni@xxxxxxxx
Subject: [gha] Re: TR: PROBLEMATIQUES SOCIETALES DE NOTRE TEMPS !
To: leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx
CC: gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; PeaceForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; IFLAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
ekahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lanayang@xxxxxxx
Dear sisters,brothers,friends and colleagues
First, thank you for the interest to my health.I am very happy for your support!
I think you know that I am under treating of the thyroid gland that was the
cause of the excess cholesterol in my blood and the blood pressure !
For three months, the cholesterol is higher than the normal value and causing
pain in my chest and slow movements at my fingers and forearms! When I move,
palpitations at the heart and chest pain!
For a month, I'm almost my movements are restricted.
With Love and peace
________________________________
De : Leo Semashko <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx>
À : ammar banni <ammarbanni@xxxxxxxx>
Cc : "gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "PeaceForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<PeaceForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "IFLAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <IFLAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"ekahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ekahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Lana Yang <lanayang@xxxxxxx>
Envoyé le : Vendredi 23 août 2013 8h10
Objet : Re: [gha] Re: TR: PROBLEMATIQUES SOCIETALES DE NOTRE TEMPS !
Dear Brother Ammar,
I understand your state and feel sorry for you illness.
I wish you a firm hope and strong will to find a good cardiac care. You've
already got the first response from Hedva of Israel. Israeli medicine is known
as one of the best in the world. Israel is the closest to your country.
Therefore, it is the first and may be the most favorable option for your
treatment.
But I'm sure you'll get even more recommendations from the GHA doctors from
around the world. The main thing - do not loss hope and seek. Members of the
GHA wish you success in this and remember we are with you at heart.
With love, best harmony wishes,
Leo
Dr Leo Semashko:
State Councillor of St. Petersburg,
Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony;
Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia;
Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA);
Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org
Global Peace Science from Harmony: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=582;
World Interfaith Harmony Project on the ABC of Harmony Base:
www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=541;
GHA Program Book, The ABC of Harmony for World Peace:
www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478;
GHA Peace Video: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA;
My Web page: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253;
Address: 7/4-42 Ho-Shi-Min Street, St. Petersburg 194356, Russia
Phone: 7 (812) 597-65-71; Skype: leo.semahko
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/leo.semashko?ref=tn_tnmn
----- Original Message -----
From: ammar banni, ammarbanni@xxxxxxxx
To: leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: 22 августа 2013 г., 20:37:59
Subject: [gha] Re: TR: PROBLEMATIQUES SOCIETALES DE NOTRE TEMPS !
Dear Sisters, Brothers, Friends, Colleagues
I was away and I will be absent because of my illness! My health does not allow
me to continue any physical or mental activity. I suffer from heart disease and
doctors did not understand the exact cause! Foundation paying my care in Paris,
interrupted this support, I am back from Paris on August 16th .The cardiologies
services in Algeria are unable to Treat my heart I call for to find a support
organization and find a good cardiologist in the world.
With Love,peace.
Ammar Banni/Professor of education
http://arabianpeople.blogspot.com/2010/09/ammar-banni-poete-algerien-ambassadeur_12.html
________________________________
De : Guy CREQUIE <guy.crequie@xxxxxxxxxx>
À : gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; PeaceForum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Peace and Conflict Studies
Center (PCS Center) <cscenter1.nepal@xxxxxxxxx>;
MANAVATAVADI-GROUP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; univ.ambassadorpeacecircle@xxxxxxxxx;
uni.alli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; globalcommunity@xxxxxxxxx; globalleaders@xxxxxxxxx;
decade@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc : roberts_susana@xxxxxxxxxxx; ekahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
carmencuphi3losangeles@xxxxxxxxx; 'Joseph Berolo' <berolojoseph@xxxxxxxxx>;
elizabethleyvarivera@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'Carlos Garrido chalen'
<manases.manases@xxxxxxxxxxx>; milagroshernandez@xxxxxxxxx; 'Milagros Coromoto
Hernandez Chiliberti' <milagros_ingenieradesuenos@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
azconacristina@xxxxxxxxxxx; bilingualmca@xxxxxxxxxxx; bilingualmca
<bilingualmca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; sipea_csanchez1@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'Ime Bisassoni'
<luzylorca@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé le : Jeudi 22 août 2013 9h39
Objet : [gha] TR: PROBLEMATIQUES SOCIETALES DE NOTRE TEMPS !
De : Guy CREQUIE [mailto:guy.crequie@xxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé : lundi 19 août 2013 11:33
Objet : PROBLEMATIQUES SOCIETALES DE NOTRE TEMPS !
PROBLEMATIQUES SOCIETALES DE NOTRE TEMPS !
(A propos du droit d’ingérence humanitaire et du droit international !)
L’opposition syrienne a accusé la communauté internationale d’être complice,
par son silence, de l’attaque « à l’arme chimique » perpétrée selon elle ce
mercredi dans une banlieue rebelle de Damas par le régime syrien, avançant le
chiffre de plus de 1.300 morts
Le système politique international actuel est basé sur la réalité des Etats
Nation basée sur la charte des Nations Unies. Avec ce système, dans les
instances internationales chaque pays dispose d’une voix.
Ce système a ses avantages, cependant, il a un grave inconvénient.
Je ne propose pas de créer de nouvelles structures, ni de modifier
arbitrairement ce qui existe
Je dis simplement qu’aujourd’hui au nom du droit au respect de son territoire,
celui de frontières juridiques et géographiques, en toute impunité des
Dictateurs ou des groupes extrémistes peuvent en toute impunité :arrêter,
détenir, torturer, assassiner, ou utiliser collectivement la force des armes,
par l’armée, la police, ou des milices pour réprimer telle ethnie, voire tout
un peuple, et ceci au nom de sa légitimité territoriale, ethnique ou
théologique.
N’est-il pas temps : de considérer l’universalisme moral kantien du respect du
droit à la dignité de la vie, de traiter l’être humain comme une fin =
principe qui est au-delà de considérations juridiques en cours. N’oublions pas
les mises en garde de Jean-Jacques ROUSSEAU.
Que faudrait-il faire ? Déjà, donner davantage de moyens à l’organisme de la
gouvernance mondiale : l’ONU !
Lors du sommet du millénaire en septembre 2000, le Secrétaire général de l’ONU
de l’époque Kofi ANNAN, indiquait que l’Institution n’avait bénéficié que de
0,5% de la somme des 800 milliards de dollars que les Etats membres avaient
dépensé pour leur défense nationale. A ceci, comme auteur, j’ajoute les 734
milliards estimés pour la vente d’armes illicites (chiffre indiqué par le
représentant d’un Etat africain) lors du sommet pour la terre organisé en 2002
à Lyon par Messieurs GORBATCHEV et STRONG avec la ville de Lyon.
Notre monde s’est doté d’Institutions juridiques internationales pour condamner
les Etats ou les personnes lors de crimes de guerre ou de crimes contre
l’humanité.
Cependant les jugements sont longs, lourds à organiser. Certes la culpabilité
n’est démontrée qu’après un jugement. Egalement, la présomption d’innocence et
les circonstances atténuantes ont à respecter normalement avant jugement.
C’est le fonctionnement logique de la justice déjà violée par des
révélations et sentences médiatiques dans certaines situations. Cependant ce
principe concerne plus des réalités individuelles que celles de massacres
collectifs.
Cependant lors de massacres avérés, injustifiables, dans un premier temps, à
l’heure de la télévision, d’internet, des satellites et du téléphone portable,
des réseaux sociaux, les institutions juridiques mondiales devraient disposer
d’un droit d’alerte d’interpellation devant les opinions publiques.
Ensuite, il faut casser cette logique rappelée par CLAUSEWITZ, selon laquelle
le recours naturel à la guerre est celui de continuer la politique par d’autres
moyens.
Le Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU devrait être doté de pouvoirs d’intervention
supplémentaires : dont celui du droit d’ingérence humanitaire sous certaines
conditions précisées après examen par un groupe d’experts juridiques
internationaux reconnus. Ceci, afin de faire respecter le droit au respect de
la dignité de la vie, de toute vie.
En la circonstance, il ne s’agirait pas de faire la guerre, mais de la
décourager, en s’interposant, appelant au dialogue, au droit à l’existence en
décourageant les velléités de guerre et les atteintes aux droits humains et si
cette force de paix est attaquée, elle riposterait avec fermeté et
détermination.
Le respect des droits humains, de la dignité de toute vie humaine aurait ses
conséquences sur celle du respect de toute vie : animale, végétale, minérale….
Si la politique ne le propose pas, c’est à l’écrivain à finalité philosophique
à la proposer.
Signalons, que la charte des Nations Unies présupposait l’existence d’une
communauté mondiale. Cependant la charte contient deux principes
contradictoires. D’après l’un des concepts, les éléments constitutifs sont les
Etats, l’autre est axé sur l’être humain en tant qu’individu. Or, dans la
structure de l’organisation des Nations Unies le premier concept prédomine et
s’illustre par des procédures évidentes.la tâche de l’organisation d’imposer
des limitations et des contraintes aux Etats s’avère compliquée dans la mesure
où les Etats sont maîtres de leurs décisions. Les Etats répugnent à se fixer
eux-mêmes leurs propres exigences dans le respect des devoirs.
Cette réalité a son incidence dans maintes décisions. Alors que nos élus
politiques, les médias ne cessent d’appeler à la mobilisation citoyenne, un
citoyen engagé de façon innovante pour la culture et la paix reçoit le plus
souvent cette réponse hallucinante des Institutions et collectivités
territoriales : seules et sous certaines conditions les associations et ONG
peuvent être aidées, mais pas un projet individuel même innovant !
Tout aussi inquiétant : Comme l’a mentionné un juriste :Frédéric SUDRE, dans un
essai de plus de 800 pages consacré au droit européen et international des
droits humains, actuellement le droit international a été incapable de donner
une définition précise du concept de peuple. Quant au droit à la vie = il reste
incertain, ceci, car si les textes internationaux énoncent le droit à la vie,
ils ne définissent pas la vie !
Pour ma part, j’ai donné ma définition de ces 2 exigences dans mon ouvrage. (1)
Copyright Guy CREQUIE
Ecrivain français à finalité philosophique
Messager de la paix de l’UNESCO
Médaillé d’or de la société académique française –Arts-Sciences-lettres »
Lauréat de l’Académie Européenne des arts
Docteur Honoris Causa de l’Académie mondiale de la culture et des arts
Représentant français d’ONG internationales de paix et d’harmonie
(1) Guy CREQUIE « Réconcilier les droits et les devoirs pour l’avenir
de l’humanité « -Editions de Saint-Amans 2010, puis Editions Universitaires
Européennes 2011, et plus récemment de »Chroniques sur le monde et enjeux
planétaires « (2) -Editions Edilivre Paris- 2013
PROBLEMS SOCIETALES OF OUR TIME!
(In connection with the right of interference humane and the international law!)
The Syrian opposition showed the international community to be accessory, by
its silence, of the attack “to the chemical weapon” perpetrated according to it
this Wednesday in rebellious suburbs of Damas by the Syrian mode, advancing the
figure of more than 1,300 deaths
The current international political system is based on the reality of the
States Nation based on the United Nations Charter. With this system, in the
international authorities each country has a voice.
This system has its advantages, however, it has a serious disadvantage.
I do not propose to create new structures, nor to modify arbitrarily what exists
I say simply that today in the name of the right to the respect of its
territory, that of legal and geographical borders, in all impunity of the
Dictators or the groups extremists can in all impunity:to stop, hold, torture,
assassinate, or use the force of the weapons collectively, by the army, the
police, or of the militia to repress such ethnos group, even a whole people,
and this in the name of his territorial, ethnic or theological legitimacy.
It is not time: to consider the Kantian moral universalism of the respect of
the right to dignity of the life, to treat the human being as an end =
principle which is beyond legal considerations in progress. Let us not forget
the warning statements of Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
What would be necessary to make? Already, to give more means to the
organization of the world governance: UNO!
At the time of the top of the millenium in September 2000, the General
secretary of UNO of the time Kofi Annan, indicated that the Institution had
profited only from 0.5% of the sum of the 800 billion dollars which the Member
States had spent for their national defense. With this, as author, I add the
734 billion estimated for the sale illicit weapons (figure indicated by the
representative of a African State) at the time of the top for the ground
organized in 2002 to Lyon by Sirs GORBATCHEV and STRONG with the town of Lyon.
Our world obtained international legal Institutions to condemn the States or
the people at the time of crime or war crimes against humanity.
However the judgments are long, heavy to organize. Admittedly the culpability
is shown only after one judgment. Also, the presumption of innocence and the
mitigating circumstances have to respect normally before judgment.
It is the logical operation of the justice already violated by media
revelations and sentences in certain situations. However this principle
concerns more of individual realities than those of collective massacres.
However at the time of proven massacres, unjustifiable, initially, at the time
of television, of Internet, the satellites and the cellphone, the social
networks, the world legal institutions should have a right of alarm of
interpellation in front of the public opinions.
Then, it is necessary to break this logic recalled by CLAUSEWITZ, according to
whom the natural recourse to the war is that to continue the policy by other
means.
The Security Council of UNO should be equipped with additional powers of
intervention: of which that of the right of interference humane under certain
conditions specified after examination by a group of expert legal international
recognized. This, in order to make respect the right to the respect of dignity
of the life, any life.
In the circumstance, it would not be a question of making the war, but to
discourage it, while interposing, calling with the dialog, the right to the
existence by discouraging inclinations of war and the attacks to the human
rights and if this force of peace is attacked, it would counteract with
firmness and determination.
The respect of the human rights, of the dignity of any human life would have
its consequences on that of the respect of any life: animal, vegetable,
mineral….
If the policy does not propose it, it is to the writer with philosophical
purpose to propose it.
Let us announce, that the United Nations Charter presupposed the existence of a
world community. However the charter contains two contradictory principles.
According to one of the concepts, the components are the States, the other is
centered on the human being as an individual. However, in the structure of the
United Nations the first concept prevails and is illustrated by procedures
évidentes.la task of the organization to impose limitations and constraints in
the States proves to be complicated insofar as the States are Masters of their
decisions. The States feel reluctant to set themselves their own requirements
in the respect of the duties.
This reality has its incidence in many decisions. Whereas our political elected
officials, the media do not cease calling with the mobilization citizen, a
committed citizen in a way innovating for the culture and peace generally
receives this incredible answer of the Institutions and territorial
collectivities: only and under certain conditions associations and ONG can be
helped, but not an individual project even innovating!
Quite as worrying: As mentioned it a lawyer:Frederic SUDRE, in a test of more
than 800 pages devoted to the European and international right of the human
rights, currently the international law was unable to give a precise definition
of the concept of people. As for the right to the life = there remains dubious,
this, because if the international texts state the right to the life, they do
not define the life!
For my part, I gave my definition of these 2 requirements in my work. (1)
Copyright Guy CREQUIE
French writer with philosophical purpose
Messenger of the peace of UNESCO
Gold medal of the French academic company - Art-Science-letters”
Award-winning of the European Academy of arts
Docteur Honoris Causa of the world Academy of the culture and arts
French representative of ONG international of peace and harmony
(1) Guy CREQUIE “To reconcile the rights and the duties for the future of
humanity “- Editions of Saint-Mercies 2010, then European University Editions
2011, and more recently of” Chronicles on the world and planetary challenges
“(2) - Editions Edilivre Paris 2013
¡PROBLEMÁTICA EMPRESARIAL DE NUESTRO TIEMPO!
(Con respecto al derecho de injerencia humanitario y al derecho internacional!)
El sistema político internacional actual se basa en la realidad de los Estados
Nación basada en la Carta de las Naciones Unidas. Con este sistema, en los
organismos internacionales cada país dispone de una voz.
Este sistema tiene sus ventajas, sin embargo, él tiene un grave inconveniente.
No propongo crear nuevas estructuras, ni modificarse arbitrariamente lo que
existe
Digo simplemente que hoy en nombre del derecho al respeto de su territorio, el
de fronteras jurídicas y geográficas, en toda impunidad de los Dictadores o
grupos extremistas pueden en toda impunidad:decidir, tener, torturar, asesinar,
o utilizar colectivamente la fuerza de las armas, por el ejército, la policía,
o de las milicias para reprimir tal etnia, o incluso a todo un pueblo, y esto
en nombre de su legitimidad territorial, étnica o teológica.
No es tiempo: considerar el universalismo moral kantien del respeto del derecho
a la dignidad de la vida, a tratar el ser humano como un final = principio que
está más allá de consideraciones jurídicas en curso. No olvidan las
advertencias de Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
¿Qué sería necesario hacer? Ya, dar aún más medios al organismo de la
gobernanza mundial: ¡la ONU!
En la cumbre del milenio en septiembre de 2000, el Secretario General de la ONU
del tiempo Kofi Annan, indicaba que la Institución sólo se había beneficiado un
0,5% de la suma de los 800 mil millones de dólares que los Estados l$miembros
habían gastado para su defensa nacional. A esto, como autor, añado 734 miles
millones considerados para la venta de armas ilícitas (cifra indicada por el
representante de un Estado africano) en la cumbre para la tierra organizada en
2002 en Lyon por Señores GORBACHEV y STRONG con la ciudad de Lyon.
Nuestro mundo se dotó con Instituciones jurídicas internacionales para condenar
a los Estados o a las personas en crímenes de guerra o crímenes contra la
humanidad.
Sin embargo los juicios son largos, pesados a organizar. Ciertamente la
culpabilidad no se demuestra hasta después un juicio. También, la presunción de
inocencia y las circunstancias atenuantes tienen que respetar normalmente antes
del juicio.
Es el funcionamiento lógico de la justicia ya violada por revelaciones
y frases de información en algunas situaciones. Sin embargo este principio se
refiere más a realidades individuales que el de masacres colectivas.
Sin embargo en masacres probadas, injustificables, inicialmente, a la hora de
la televisión, Internet, los satélites y el teléfono portable, de las redes
sociales, las instituciones jurídicas mundiales deberían tener derecho de
alerta de interpelación ante las opiniones públicas.
A continuación, es necesario romper esta lógica recordada por CLAUSEWITZ, según
la cual el recurso natural a la guerra es el seguir la política por otros
medios.
El Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU debería ser dotado con poderes de
intervención suplementarios: que el del derecho de injerencia humanitario bajo
algunas condiciones precisadas tras examen por un grupo de expertos jurídicos
internacionales reconocidos. Y ello, con el fin de hacer respetar el derecho al
respeto de la dignidad de la vida, de toda vida.
En la circunstancia, no se trataría de hacer la guerra, pero de desalientarla,
al interponerse, apelante al diálogo, al derecho a la existencia al desalientar
las veleidades de guerra y los ataques a los derechos humanos y si esta fuerza
de paz se ataca, contrariaría con firmeza y determinación.
El respeto de los derechos humanos, de la dignidad de toda vida humana tendría
sus consecuencias sobre la del respeto de toda vida: animal, vegetal, mineral….
Si la política no lo propone, es al escritor con finalidad filosófico por
proponerlo.
Indiquemos, que la Carta de las Naciones Unidas presuponía la existencia de una
comunidad mundial. Sin embargo la carta contiene dos principios
contradictorios. Según uno de los conceptos, los elementos constitutivos son
los Estados, el otro se orienta hacia el ser humano como individuo. Ahora bien,
en la estructura de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas el primer concepto
prevalece y se ilustra por procedimientos évidentes.la intenta de la
organización que imponga limitaciones y dificultades en Estados resultan
complicados en la medida en que los Estados son amos de sus decisiones. Los
propios Estados repugnan a establecerse sus propias exigencias en cumplimiento
de los deberes.
Esta realidad tiene su incidencia en muchas decisiones. Mientras que nuestros
cargos electos políticos, los medios de comunicación no dejan de llamar a la
movilización ciudadana, un ciudadano comprometido de manera innovadora para la
cultura y la paz recibe generalmente esta respuesta que alucina Instituciones y
a colectividades territoriales: ¡sólo y bajo algunas condiciones las
asociaciones y ONG pueden ser ayudadas, pero no un proyecto individual incluso
innovador!
Igualmente inquietante: Como lo mencionó un jurista:Frédéric SUDRE, en una
prueba de más de 800 páginas consagrada al derecho europeo e internacional de
los derechos humanos, actualmente el derecho internacional fue incapaz de dar
una definición precisa del concepto de pueblo. ¡En cuanto al derecho a la vida
= sigue siendo dudoso, esto, ya que si los textos internacionales enuncian el
derecho a la vida, no definen la vida!
Por mi parte, di mi definición de estas 2 exigencias en mi obra. (1)
Copyright Guy CREQUIE
Escritor francés con finalidad filosófica
Mensajero de la paz de la UNESCO
Medallista de oro de la sociedad académica francesa - arte-ciencia-Cartas”
Laureado de la Academia Europea de las artes
Docteur Honoris Causa de la Academia mundial de la cultura y las artes
Representante francés de ONG internacionales de paz y armonía
1) Guy CREQUIE “reconciliar los derechos y los deberes para el futuro de la
humanidad “- Ediciones de Santo-Paz 2010, luego Ediciones Universitarias
Europeas 2011, y más recientemente de” Crónicas sobre el mundo y lo que está en
juego a niveles planetarios “(2) - Ediciones Edilivre París 2013
__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages
in this topic (2) Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
More detailed information about our community is located on our International
Website "A New Culture of Peace from Social Harmony and Children’s Priority"
(shortly "Peace from harmony")
www.peacefromharmony.org.
It unites now about 200 co-authors/members from 34 countries of the world and
it is published in 15 languages.
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us
Feedback
.
__,_._,___
Other related posts:
