-------- Original Message --------Subject: [gha] Fwd: Re: Re: Re : Re: (peace from harmony) Need to Approve or Disapprove New Peace Book from GHA --- Anyone who denies the peace theory (= science), that denies peace in reality
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 22:00:26 +0300 From: Hedva Bachrach <hedgad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To: gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -------- Original Message --------Subject: Re: [gha] Re: Re : Re: (peace from harmony) Need to Approve or Disapprove New Peace Book from GHA --- Anyone who denies the peace theory (= science), that denies peace in reality
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 21:57:46 +0300 From: Hedva Bachrach <hedgad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxOn 04/10/2013 14:24, Bruce Cook, AuthorMe.com wrote:*Although I am not a religious person in the common sense, I want to express my opinion about this debate by bringing an example from Judaism, my faith.
In Judaism the basic constitution of behavior are the ten commandments, apart from that every Jewish person has to fill at least 613 good deeds in his life, which are given to various interpretations throughout the ages. Laws and codes are the result of the interpretation of the period, sometimes more severe and sometimes less. In Judaism there are various religious groups, with their own interpretation. However all of them are jewish. ( or let me say hebrews, as Judeans were only one tribe of 12 ancient tribes ).
In the matter of peace ideologies, a basic ground should be revered, but various ideologies should look at each other and find together a common ground, with additions of thought. It is very important, as the road to world peace is very very difficult ( people creating these ideologies should also pay attention to the obstacles for peace in the world of today, as without paying attention to them and how to solve them socio economically, scientifically and otherwise, the road to peace would be hard.) At least people who think and form infrastructures for peace should contact and find a common way of agreement.
Dr. Hedva Rabinson Bachrach hedgad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx *
Julie, A beautiful statement. Thank you. Bruce Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From: * Julia Budnikova <msssm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;*To: * <gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'AuthorMe.com''Bruce Cook' <cookcomm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Bruce Cook' <amplicraft@xxxxxxxxx>; <ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Glen T''Martin' <gmartin@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Subhash Chandra' <schandra101@xxxxxxxxx>; 'AK Merchant' <ak9merchant@xxxxxxxxx>; 'MATJAŽ MULEJ' <mulej@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Norm Kurland' <thirdway@xxxxxxxx>;*Cc: * <peace-from-harmony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;*Subject: * [gha] Re: Re : Re: (peace from harmony) Need to Approve or Disapprove New Peace Book from GHA --- Anyone who denies the peace theory (= science), that denies peace in reality*Sent: * Fri, Oct 4, 2013 6:48:47 AMDear Leo, dear All! In order that people ceased to kill each other, they have to change not the theory, they have to have new world outlook, other relation to surrounding reality. I ask to notice, these are different things. The theory is the closed system, outlook is opened and developing. We can only help to change a priority of values at people. In order that people became more harmonious, they have to understand Harmony laws on which the universe is based. We, scientists, have to study and find Harmony laws, in different spheres: sociology, psychology, music, physics, picture. I think, it and will be a philosophical view of things. Only in this sense I express a consent to conform to the rules of the GHA in news book. From the beginning we came to a conclusion that harmony is pledge of the Peace. I think, for our association this theoretical base is enough. I believe, members of the ABC of harmony aspired to it, instead of to express the relation to tetrasociology. The war is disharmony, harmony violation. This sufficient basis that the GHA and the world science which we are going to create, denied it. Leo Semashko assumed a grandiose role to unite many people in the peace and harmony, but the tetrasociology is its personal contribution to business of new science of the peace, it can't become this science. It only part of New science of the Peace.Excuse for my English through the Translate. Julia Budnikova, Deputy director of Roerich Family Museum and Institute, President GHA-RUSSIA -----Original Message-----From: gha-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> [mailto:gha-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>] On Behalf Of Lida SherafatmandSent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 10:55 AMTo: gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>; AuthorMe.com''Bruce Cook; 'Bruce Cook'; ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>; Glen T''Martin; 'Subhash Chandra'; 'AK Merchant'; 'MATJAŽ MULEJ'; 'Norm Kurland'Cc: peace-from-harmony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>Subject: [gha] Re : Re: (peace from harmony) Need to Approve or Disapprove New Peace Book from GHA --- Anyone who denies the peace theory (= science), that denies peace in realityDear AllAs a person researching peace theories in international relations, I look at the "peace from harmony" proposition by Leo, as ONE of the scholarly proposals which have been put forward... there are other propositions by other scholarly thinkers which all contribute a piece to the jigkso puzzle of life. As Julia pointed out no theory is ever 100% complete, because of the complexity of life and the different layers of reality... each theory can tackle only a certain number of those layers, and that is why they are respectable.With warm regards Lida Lida Sherafatmand, Painter and poet, www.lidsher.com GHA Board Vice-president, President, GHA Female Contest: "Muse of Harmony" http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=474 The ABC of Harmony coauthor http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478 Paris and Malta --------------------------------------------En date de : Mer 2.10.13, Julia Budnikova <msssm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>> a écrit :Objet: [gha] Re: (peace from harmony) Need to Approve or Disapprove New Peace Book from GHA --- Anyone who denies the peace theory (= science), that denies peace in reality À: gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>, "'Bruce Cook, AuthorMe.com'" <cookcomm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>>, "'Bruce Cook'" <amplicraft@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>>, ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>, "'Martin, Glen T'" <gmartin@xxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>>, "'Subhash Chandra'" <schandra101@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>>, "'AK Merchant'" <ak9merchant@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>>, "'MATJAŽ MULEJ'" <mulej@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>>, "'Norm Kurland'" <thirdway@xxxxxxxx <javascript:return>>Cc: peace-from-harmony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> Date: Mercredi 2 octobre 2013, 20h52 Re: (peace from harmony) Need to Approve or Disapprove New Peace Book from GHA --- Anyone who denies the peace theory (= science), that denies peace in reality I ask Leo to consider opinion of mister Bruce Cook: “We just need a coherent editorial policy, justified by reader interests and needs.”. We have to be extremely unostentatious in theory questions. I ask to pay attention that any Doctrine of Life never was the finished theory. It gave a certain volume of knowledge. Julia Budnikova, Deputy director of Roerich Family Museum and Institute, President GHA-RUSSIA From: gha-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> [mailto:gha-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>] On Behalf Of Leo Semashko Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 8:22 PM To: Bruce Cook, AuthorMe.com; Bruce Cook; ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>; Martin,Glen T; gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>; Subhash Chandra; AK Merchant;MATJAŽ MULEJ; Norm Kurland Cc: peace-from-harmony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> Subject: [gha] Re: (peace from harmony) Need to Approve or Disapprove New Peace Book from GHA --- Anyone who denies the peace theory (= science), that denies peace in reality Dear Bruce, Thank you for your response, but it confuses our cards and generates the following misconceptions: 1. You formulate the question this way: Need to Approve or Disapprove New Peace Book from GHA. However, we discuss and vote on another issue: The Rules for the articles in Global Peace Science book! GHA approved on September 21 a new project/book: Global Peace Science: The First Common Good for the 21st Century and every Human, based on the theory/science of social harmony, see here: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=585. Therefore, GHA has already decided the issue of the book and its scientific content. You, like others, strongly supported it in your letter of September 19: “This project has my full support”. Now, after 12 days, we do not understand why you put this question again? 2. You write: As a reader, I would prefer to read about methods and strategies leaving to world peace. However, according to this proposal, the articles are to be limited to the GHA theory. Please, separate the readers and authors. If GHA creates Science/Theory of Global Peace, which brings together in harmony all diversity of the different peacemaking ideas, methods and strategies, all its readers will be satisfied, including you as reader. On the other hand, if the GHA creates Global Peace Science, then it can not be without a theory. Any author as scientist understands that. There can not be a science (and a book about it) without a theory: it's nonsense. We do not understand you. Moreover, in your flattering review of the ABC of Harmony you fully support the GHA theory and do not share “book on peace” and “GHA peace theory”. Here are some quotes from your review of the ABC of Harmony: “I welcome the publication of The ABC of Harmony. I commend its authors and their associates for bringing this positive pronouncement to the attention of world leaders. While the prevailing disharmonious industrial thinking makes peace seem impractical, all mankind should grasp the harmonious philosophy which has vast potential to settle international differences before it is too late. ... Any thoughtful reasoning on the history of peace sustains one main point of The ABC of Harmony, that warfare just leads to temporary peace which is followed by preparation for further warfare, and this is clearly an imperfect solution to the universally recognized need to attain world peace. This holistic viewpoint, supplemented by extensive scientific knowledge, has made it possible to open the Age of Harmonious Enlightenment of humanity in the 21st century. Now, based upon Leo Semashko's pioneering work in 1999 (the first handbook of Tetrasociology), we see the development of several international conferences and a timely and high potential approach to world peace. Here disparate theories merge into harmonious thinking and work together for the betterment of mankind. The book ABC of Harmony is a handbook for this movement, and outlines the philosophical and scientific rationale for the Global Harmony Association. It includes the philosophical basis (theory and sciences), applications, recognition of past leaders, and selections from the arts representing many cultures. I heartily recommend this book for anyone preparing to support worldpeace. This may be our only chance!” (www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=544)You wrote this wonderful text for the GHA theory/science about a year ago. Are you now refusing it? Please let us know it. 3. Our Rules for the authors (not the readers) do not close for participation in our book/science a one author but with the condition to understand and express their attitudes, including critical, to the GHA theory. Why this condition? Because for 60 years of peace research in the world were written millions of peace articles and books, have been carried out tens of thousands of peace conferences and seminars by thousands of peace organizations, but their practical effect, as we see today is close to zero: the war and terror spread world, military spending is galloping and so on. It is an absolute fact. These books and articles today are not needed to nobody. The world today is as far from peace as it was 60 years ago. Why? One reason – it is the lack of a scientific theory of global peace, which would be able to combine into a single whole all diversity of the different peace ideas and all their peacekeeping potential. For comparison, the military potential and all the military ideas are effective because they are consolidated by a single world military science. Why do you want to disarm Global Peace Science/Book, depriving it the essence, depriving it a scientific theory? What happened with your peace vision? 4. I can explain your position, as well as the position of Ayo and Didi, just the fact that you, unfortunately, did not participated in creation of the ABC of Harmony, have not passed its school of collective creativity that has contained all diversity of the different ideas that have been offered to us, including the very different ideas of Glen, Norman, Evelyn, Laj, Rudolph and dozens of others. Where have you seen like that? This is unprecedented in the world! You do not know this school and its epistemological experience, so you are trying to prove that million + 1 peaceful book on "the deaf choir" principle (this book also no one will be need) will be better than scientific book, the articles of which will be consolidated by a single theory. But this is a step back because of your lack of understanding. I invite you to come back to the Rules and tell them or “YES” or “NO” as scientific author. 5. You do not say “NO” to the proposed Rules of scientific theoretical oneness. You do not offer them any alternative. You offer to discuss and vote a confusing alternative "book/science or theory", not realizing that the lack of a theory makes the book a senseless and useless. Let me remind you the golden words of the great scientist Ludwig Boltzmann: “There is nothing more practical than a good theory.” This fully applies to global peace. It never comes until a good peace theory will not be established. Anyone who denies the peace theory (= science) that denies peace in reality. This is proven by history. I think you will agree with this, if you really want peace, and together we begin to create Global Peace Book/Science, the core of which is a good theory of social harmony, founded by Immanuel Kant. Do you agree to participate in this unprecedented scientific/theoretical process? Thank you. With love, best harmony wishes, Leo Dr Leo Semashko: State Councillor of St. Petersburg, Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony; Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia; Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA) since 2005; Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.orgGlobal Peace Science from Harmony: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=585 andIn Russian: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key=606; World Interfaith Harmony Project on the ABC of Harmony Base: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=541; GHA Program Book, The ABC of Harmony for World Peace: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=478; GHA Peace Video: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA; My Web page: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253; Address: 7/4-42 Ho-Shi-Min Street, St. Petersburg 194356, Russia Phone: 7 (812) 597-65-71; Skype: leo.semahko Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/leo.semashko?ref=tn_tnmn ----- Original Message -----From: Bruce Cook, AuthorMe.com, cookcomm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>To: leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> Sent: 2 октября 2013 г., 5:10:00 Subject: (peace from harmony) Need to Approve or Disapprove New Peace Book from GHA We need to vote on this. Everyone, I appreciate this chance for us to consider what new new GHA volume on peace should contain. As a reader, I would prefer to read about methods and strategies leaving to world peace. However, according to this proposal, the articles are to be limited to the GHA theory. This means, for example, if I could arrange for Hillary Clinton or someone to give us ideas on peace, the article would be rejected because it lacks what I might best be called *GHA Primacy*, which could mean that peace methods are only important if they show respect for the theories propounded in the ABC of Harmony. For the life of em I have no idea why we would limit the study of world peace to such a framework. I thought our goal was peace, not a theory. Actually, as I reflect, it is disappointing when a peace theorist tries to insist that his or her theory is the only or the best one. To some extent, this is a problem in several schools of thought. So I would urge everyone to vote for a book on peace, not GHA peace theory. But then, again, the dice may seem to be loaded as we have only a few days in which to respond. I vote for a book on peace. In peace and harmony, BruceOn Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Leo Semashko <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>>wrote:> ** > > > Dear Glen, Matjaz, Merchant and Subhash, > > Many thanks for your wonderful first articles in the GHA new book: "*Global > Peace Science: The First Common Good for the 21st Century and every Human* > ." > > I'm very glad you were started and included in the long and difficult > process of collective creating the world's first sample of Global Peace > Science (GPS) based on the global harmony theory presented in *the ABC of > Harmony for Global Peace* .... (* > www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyG8*). In this process, we will > try, as in ABC, to unite in harmonious whole the dozens of authors’ > articles with dozens of different understandings. *The ABC of harmony* was > the first step on this way. It had reached many but is far from perfection > still. GPS is the conscious second step on this way in which we must go > further in achieving our harmonious unity of our theoretical diversity. > > This is a common and difficult process for each GPS participant, so we > need to establish some general rules that we understood each other better > and avoided or minimized the frictions and conflicts between us because of > this misunderstanding. I think everyone would agree with that. Therefore, I > propose *to discuss and approve by your YES or NO for 3 days (if > necessary, we will increase this term), up to October 3 inclusively the > following "Rules for Authors’ Articles in GPS." > > *1. Global Peace Science (hereinafter - GPS) in the GHA first conception > and execution as a synergetic and harmonious synthesis of various authors > articles - *this is not the end but only the beginning* of an endless > evolution of scientific consciousness of global peace, without which > humanity can not survive and develop further as a single family of the > world peoples. > > 2. Each author's article in GPS is the answer to the main question: *"What > I imagine as the most effective pursuit of global peace science in a whole > or its separate aspect on the basis of GHA sources and my own vision?”* > > 3. GPS, which is the science of social harmony, there can be a collection > of disparate articles lacking internal harmonious unity and compiled on a > principle of "deaf choir, or choir of the deaf." This is contrary to > harmonious essence of GPS. > > 4. GPS of harmony should be a model of harmony. It is provided by the GPS > united harmonious architecture that combines a variety of peacemaking ideas > in organically integral/holistic knowledge of global peace in all its > aspects. > > 5. Harmonious architecture of GPS by the most concise way is expressed in > *Socionome* of *the ABC of Harmony *on two pages (40-41). The author of > each article could determine, primarily, to what sphere of global peace the > main subject of his article relates. These spheres are four: *sociosphere* > , *infosphere* (the spiritual realm), *orgsphere* (the sphere of > politics, law, finance, management, etc.) and *technoecosphere* (economic/ecological > sphere). The definition of one or more spheres for the article along with a > reference to Socionome could be the beginning of the author's articles and > the base of its classification in the GPS. The more detailed explanations > of Socionome can be found in GHA other sources. > > 6. Each author's article suggests a scientific explanation of one or > another necessary aspect of global peace in one (or more) of its four > spheres. This aspect may have a cognitive background in the GPS letters, > proposals and outline, which were concentrated in the GHA initiative for > G20 and published here: *www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyX2*, > either in the GPS key ideas presented in the book project here: * > www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyX5*. > > 7. The search and scientific analysis of the preconditions of the GHA > sources, along with their quoting, could form the introductory part of the > authors’ articles. Attracting and analysis of other backgrounds from other > sources is welcome: they will enrich the scientific content of GPS. > > 8. The empirical studies, if they are assumed to be in the author's > article, it is advisable to connect and compare with the GPS empirical > foundation in Comparative Sociological Statistical Study (CSSS: * > www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyW9*) > > 9. Based on the previous steps, the author will define the final title of > his/her article, and will choose for its an adequate section of the book > proposed contents or will offer for it new section. > > 10. GPS will be next, after *the ABC of Harmony*, a step in the peace > Tetranet harmonious thinking, which involves the synthesis of the contents > of each author's article in the tetra- model. This is the most complex and > subtle intellectual moment. Therefore, the GPS book editor invites the > authors of articles to joint formation of such models in the process of > bilateral dialogue since November 2013. > > These 10 simple rules, I think, will provide a high scientific level and > necessary harmonious consolidation of different articles in a one organic > whole of the GPS first version from harmony. They will also provide the > spirit of Emile Durkheim's collective solidary peace consciousness, > integrating in harmony the diversity of peace ideas and peace imagination. > I also hope that the discussion of these rules will clarify, enrich and > make them more effective. > > Of course, these rules are not a panacea for all internal epistemological > problems of our difficult collective creative process, but they create a > certain framework and dimensions system for its harmonization and coherent > organization. > > As for the art works for GPS, in a short time, we, along with Ernesto > Kahan, as Chair of the Commission and Jury will present similar rules, as > the development of 10 these, for your consideration. These rules will > provide high quality of the original articles and artwork for GPS, as well > as our book of GPS as a whole. > > With love, best harmony wishes, > > Leo > > Dr Leo Semashko: > State Councillor of St. Petersburg, > Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony; > Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia; > Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA) since 2005; > Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org > Global Peace Science from Harmony: > www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyX5 and > In Russian: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=ru_c&key`6; > World Interfaith Harmony Project on the ABC of Harmony Base: > www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyT1; > GHA Program Book, The ABC of Harmony for World Peace: > www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyG8; > GHA Peace Video: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA; > My Web page: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key%3; > Address: 7/4-42 Ho-Shi-Min Street, St. Petersburg 194356, Russia > Phone: 7 (812) 597-65-71; Skype: leo.semahko > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/leo.semashko?ref=tn_tnmn > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Subhash Chandra, schandra101@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> > To: leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> > Sent: 28 сентября 2013 г., 17:43:53 > Subject: [gha] Re: Invitation to Global Peace Science Imagination - > First Bird for GPS Book > > Dear Dr Leo Semashko: > Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA) > I am forwarding my article on “Peace through Harmony: Peaceful > Coexistence in 21st Century *“Vasudheiva Kutumbkam - (World is one family) > *for the book - *GHA new project-book: "Global Peace Science: The First > Common Good for the 21st Century" * > We are threatened by nuclear destruction and economic collapse. Nuclear > armament is the major threat to world peace. Nuclear armament constitute > the greatest threat man has ever known Even without a war, nuclear > stockpiling and radiation from nuclear testing threaten destruction of the > human race. *“In the event of a nuclear war there will be no victors > because there will be no survivors…” said His Holiness the Dalai Lama. > Therefore the biggest agenda for the Twenty-First Century is: How to save > the Humanity and How to create Peaceful planet? > * > *Call of the Time: > *To meet the present global challenges & to save the humanity from > further destruction it is the time to search our heart & soul and turn our > attention inwardly to change our values & attitude to achieve the goal of > developing sustainable peace in the society. We have to change our > consciousness & our attitude from Culture of Violence & war to Culture of > Peace & harmony for creating a peaceful planet. > Now is the time to *"Thinking together is a new vision of start, working > together is a new start for converting vision into actions for developing > Global Harmonious Society.” > Global Peace Science Movement for Humanity*: The present situation calls > for a drastic strengthening of “Global Peace Science Movement for Humanity > – Growth through Peace and for Peace but not for War”. It's time to focus > on ‘*Thinking together & Working together’ on *Global Peace Science > movement involving all the Leaders to save the humanity. > “Global Peace and Interfaith Harmony for the 21st Century” > * “Vasudheiva Kutumbkam* - One Family, One Religion & One > Harmony” > Peace is the ultimate aspiration of mankind all over the world, despite > all ethnic, cultural and other differences. Without peace, life loses its > intrinsic meaning, beauty and dignity. This human aspiration is expressed > in a variety of forms: poetical, artistic, spiritual, and so on across > different cultures. > *Basically, all religions believe in peace, equality and helping the > less fortunate. To live in peace one must respect all religions. > * > *According to Indian Vedic Philosophy: Harmony is Vasudheva Kutumbkam (entire > world being a single family abandoning all differences or divisions). > Harmony is not just a unified system of belief encoded in a declaration of > faith; it is rather an umbrella comprising the plurality of religious > phenomena originating from the Vedic tradition > * > Harmony is a philosophy of unity i.e. *“Vasudheva Kutumbkam”* means > Peaceful Co-existence for all* > .* > *Vasudheva Kutumbkam’* is *Global Peace Science for Humanity for > creating a Peaceful planet.* The world is one family has been expressed > in our scriptures. The oneness of humanity has been a fundamental belief of > Indian Civilization. Global Peace & oneness of Humanity can only be > achieved through cultivating the Global culture of Peace & Harmony. > Dr.Subhash Chandra > > Dr.Subhash Chandra > Members – Global Harmony Association & > GHA Ambassador of Peace and Disarmament from Harmony > http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyX3 > Project Director- Global Peace & Humanity Project* > Convener* *GPF-India - *Global Peace Foundation – India > www.globalpeace.org > *Director- *Global Peace & Interfaith Harmony Project (GPIH India) > www.globalpeacefestival.org/ > Guest faculty - Central Institute of Business Management (CIBM-RD), Nagpur > & > Chief Advisor- International Centre of Spirituality & Leadership (ICSL) > Nagpur. President (Hon.) > World Peace & Cultural Centre (WPCC), Ujjain India > *International Coordinator, WWA- World Without Anger Kathmandu, Nepal > www.worldwithoutanger.org > > > *On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Bruce Cook, AuthorMe.com < > cookcomm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>> wrote: > Dear Matjaz, > > A wonderful submission. Thank you > > Yours in harmony, > > Bruce > Bruce L. Cook, Ph.D. > President, GHA-USA > Vice-President, GHA > Director of CSSS Publishing and Editorial team > President, World Writers Resources, Inc. > Author, *Harmony of Nations: 1943 – 2020*, Just Fiction Editions, 2012 > 1407 Getzelman Drive > Elgin, IL 60123 USA > 312-859-8090 > cookcomm@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> > www.harmonyofnations.com > http://author-me.com > http://www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyT4 > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* MATJAŽ MULEJ <mulej@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>> > *To:* "gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>" <gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>>; "leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>" < > leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>> > *Cc:* "info@xxxxxxx <javascript:return>" <info@xxxxxxx <javascript:return>> > *Sent:* Saturday, September 28, 2013 3:26 AM > > *Subject:* [gha] Re: Invitation to Global Peace Science Imagination - > First Bird for GPS Book > > Dear Leo, > > is the attached short article interesting for your Global Peace Science > book? > > Best, > Matjaz > ------------------------------> *From:* gha-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> [gha-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>]on behalf of > Leo Semashko [leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>] > *Sent:* Friday, September 27, 2013 4:54 PM > *To:* Martin, Glen T> *Cc:* gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>; p.alvarez@xxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>; ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>;> peace-from-harmony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> > *Subject:* [gha] Re: Invitation to Global Peace Science Imagination - > First Bird for GPS Book > > Dear Glen, > > Thank you very much for your excellent and great article in the Global > Peace Science book! > > Your article is the first bird for this book. Of course, later, we will > discuss it in the details, may be in the October end or in November. > > With love, best harmony wishes, > > Leo > > Dr Leo Semashko: > State Councillor of St. Petersburg, > Philosopher, Sociologist and Peacemaker from Harmony; > Director: Tetrasociology Public Institute, Russia; > Founding President, Global Harmony Association (GHA); > Director, GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org > Global Peace Science from Harmony: > www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyX2; > World Interfaith Harmony Project on the ABC of Harmony Base: > www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyT1; > GHA Program Book, The ABC of Harmony for World Peace: > www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyG8; > GHA Peace Video: http://youtu.be/hbxY5lREOeA; > My Web page: www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key%3; > Address: 7/4-42 Ho-Shi-Min Street, St. Petersburg 194356, Russia > Phone: 7 (812) 597-65-71; Skype: leo.semahko > Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/leo.semashko?ref=tn_tnmn > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Martin, Glen T, gmartin@xxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> > To: leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> > Sent: 26 сентября 2013 г., 22:11:07 > Subject: [gha] Re: Invitation to Global Peace Science Imagination > > Dear Leo, > > Please find my 3 page article submission for the book on Global Peace > Science. > > Yours in peace and friendship, > > Glen Martin > > > *Dr. Glen T. Martin > * > President, World Constitution and Parliament Assoc. (www.wcpa.biz, > www.worldparliament-gov.org) > President, Institute on World Problems (www.worldproblems.net) > Professor of Philosophy, Radford University (www.radford.edu/gmartin) > > >> *From:* gha-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> [mailto:gha-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>]*On > Behalf Of *Leo Semashko > *Sent:* Monday, September 23, 2013 11:50 AM> *To:* williamsbj@xxxxxx <javascript:return>; c.von-furstenberg@xxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>;> p.alvarez@xxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>> *Cc:* gha@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>; ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>;> peace-from-harmony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:return> > *Subject:* [gha] Invitation to Global Peace Science Imagination > > INVITATION > TO GLOBAL PEACE SCIENCE IMAGINATION > > For scientists, poets, painters and composers; for religious, political, > women's, youth and other community leaders; for Heads of States and > Governments; for employees of the UN, UNESCO, UNICEF and other > international organizations; for Nobel Peace Laureates; for all who are > known to be peace-loving with a firm commitment to peace. > *The Global Harmony Association* (GHA: *www.peacefromharmony.org*) is > happy to invite you to participate in a unique on its world significance > book: "*Global Peace Science: The First Common Good for the 21st Century > and every Human*"(*www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyX5*). We would > be thrilled to include your art work or article up to 3 pages (at your > request it may be more) to answer this subject: *"What I imagine as the > most effective pursuit of global peace science for the 21st Century on the > basis of GHA sources and my own vision?”* Your art work or article will > be featured in one of the book chapters or a new chapter, proposed by you. > The book will be published in September 2014. > The deadline for articles is November 30, 2013; for the art works is April > 30, 2014. > This can be modified at your request. > Your article or work would be sent, by e-mail in attached file WORLD.doc, > to the GHA President, the book Editor in Chief Dr. Leo Semashko (* > leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:return>*) or another GHA leader at the address here: > Contact Us (*www.peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&keyW4*). > GHA will highly appreciate and publish your response to this invitation > with any suggestions and comments. This invitation may be distributed > freely. > September 2013 > > > > -- > Subhash Chandra > > > __._,_.___ Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1) Recent Activity: Visit Your Group More detailed information about our community is located on our International Website "A New Culture of Peace from Social Harmony and Children’s Priority" (shortly "Peace from harmony") www.peacefromharmony.org. It unites now about 200 co-authors/members from 34 countries of the world and it is published in 15 languages. Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us Feedback . __,_._,___