Dear All.It is too early to take any drastic decision in this regard . Let us
wait and see. It is an important strategic issue and needs some time to
decide.All the bestThank you.Maitreyee Bardhan RoyFrom: "\'Sanjay
Tewari\' via Women\'s Global Harmony Association (WGHA)"
<womengha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:28:42To: Leo
Semashko <leo.semashko@xxxxxxxxx>, Cdr Bhushan
<commander.bhushan.dewan@xxxxxxxxx>Cc:
"gha-peace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gha-peace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ghausa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"womengha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <womengha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Subhash Chandra <schandra101@xxxxxxxxx>, ANNAMALAI A
<nationalgandhimuseum@xxxxxxxxx>, KANAK DUGAR
<kanakmaldugar@xxxxxxxxx>, "Dr.AK MERCHANT"
<akmerchant@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "A. K. Merchant"
<merchant.ak@xxxxxxxxx>, "Dr. Subhash Sharma"
<prof.subhash.sharma789@xxxxxxxxx
>, maitreyee bardhanroy <maitreyee25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, SANBUN
PUBLISHERS <sanbunpublishers@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Brig kartar singh
<kartarbirar@xxxxxxxxx>, ravi bhatia <ravipbhatia@xxxxxxxxx>, Latif
Kirmani <latifkirmani@xxxxxxxxx>, "Dr. Surendra Pathak"
<pathak06@xxxxxxxxx>, Ashokchakravarthy Tholana
<tacvarthy@xxxxxxxxx>, pravat dhal <pravatkumar.dhal@xxxxxxxxx>,
Markandey Rai <markandey.rai@xxxxxxxxx>, Mairead - Peace People
<mairead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Scales Avery
<avery.john.s@xxxxxxxxx>, Bernard Scott <bernces1@xxxxxxxxx>,
"Prof. Ernesto Kahan" <ekahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ayo Ayoola-Amale
<iaewpng@xxxxxxxxx>, Michael Ellis MD <mindquest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Nenad Javornik <nenadjavornik@xxxxxxxxx>, Rene Wadlow
<rene.wadlow@xxxxxxxxx>, "Noor M. Larik"
<nmlarik@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Rashida Bokhari
<rashida.bokhari@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Mazhar Hashmi <mazhari
bd@xxxxxxxxx>, Habib Ullah Khan <habibullah54@xxxxxxxxx>, Zia ul
Islam <hdrziaulislam@xxxxxxxxx>, ayeshabokhari@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Ja.varia@xxxxxxxxxxx, Umer Zia <iumerzia@xxxxxxxxx>, bhatti_sb@xxxxxxxxx,
fuzzyrelation@xxxxxxxxx, steve amoah <steveamoah@xxxxxxxxx>, Susana
Roberts <roberts_susana@xxxxxxxxxxx>, delasnievedaspet
<delasnievedaspet@xxxxxxxxx>, Mara Cristina Azcona
<mcrisazcona@xxxxxxxxx>, Guy CREQUIE <gcrequie1143@xxxxxxxxx>,
guy.crequie@xxxxxxxxxx, Adigun Afeez <adigunafeez@xxxxxxxxx>, "H.E.
Dr. Major General Arvind Kumar Sharma" <ambassadorindia3@xxxxxxxxx>,
moriikae <moriikae@xxxxxxxxx>, Habyarimana Heli
<hhabyarimanaheli@xxxxxxxxx>, leela pradhan <leelaprd@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
ammar banni <ammarbanni@xxxxxxxx>, Debidatta Aurobinda Mahapatra
<arvind.mahapatra@xxxxxxxxx>, Justo Bolekia Bolek
<bolekiaj@xxxxxxx>, profrksingh@xxxxxxxxx, Stephen.tabi@xxxxxxxxx,
EarthstarRadio &l
t;earthstarradio@xxxxxxx>, Takis Ioannides
<takis.ioannides@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gopala Mariappan
<drgopala@xxxxxxxxx>, "Pintu Kumar (As-Prof Geog MU-B_Gaya)"
<pintubhu145@xxxxxxxxx>, Vladislav Krasnov <president92@xxxxxxxxx>,
Lucas Pawlik <pawlik.lucas@xxxxxxxxx>, bngglobalholding@xxxxxxxxx, Waheed
Ahmad Ch <waheed2010@xxxxxxxxxxx>, maqsud nuri
<maqsud.nuri@xxxxxxxxxxx>Subject: Re: “Gandhica-Kashmir”
project approved, but rejected from implementation
Yes, agreed with Cdr Bhushan. There is a mistake in that table.
Peace
Dr Sanjay Tewari
On Sunday, 18 August, 2019, 07:48:41 pm IST, Cdr Bhushan
<commander.bhushan.dewan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Dr Leo,
Thank you for your trailing mail of today.
It’s a detailed and painstaking work that you have put down a detailed
summary table and record of so many mails. Sincere compliments for the great
effort.
However, with respect to the content on the url
àhttps://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=899, REQUEST FOLLOWING ;
CLARIFICATIONS:-
A] In the mail-chain Lucas Pawlik has said- “NO” in his 18-08-19
mail, but in the summary table, I don’t find his name on the side of
‘NO”.
B] Dr Dhal – has said ‘NO’ in his 06-08-19 mail, but his name
is in YES tally in the summary table.
C] Maitreyee Roy – has not said to the project in any of her mails quoted
on the page at the url, including the one on 10-08-19, but nher name appears on
the side of YES in the summary table.
Thanks and regards
Cdr Bhushan Dewan
18 Aug 2019/7.47 PM- India Time
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:17 PM Leo Semashko <leo.tetrism76@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dear GHA members, friends,The discussion and approval of the GHA
Gandhica-Kashmir peacemaking project ended as an attempt to apply our unique
scientific interpretation of the Gandhi great legacy of non-violence to the
protracted (over 73 years) armed conflict in Kashmir between India and
Pakistan.Their overall result can be briefly expressed as follows. Although the
majority of the GHA members approved it with 17 “YES” votes against
13 “NO” votes, however, due to the fact that members of interested
countries rejected it and denied its worthy support and desire to realize it,
depriving it of the real social soil in the GHA, THIS PROJECT REJECTED FROM
IMPLEMENTATION. There is no one to do it!This conclusion is confirmed by the
following facts. During the discussion within 12 days (August 6-18) we received
74 responses from 30 GHA members of 11 countries, which are summarized in the
table:
GHA Voting Result of the“Gandhica – Kashmir” Peacemaking
Project from August 6 to 18,
2019:https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=899Summary Table
VOICES
“YES”
VOICES “NO”
Umer Zia
Pakistan
Sanjay Tewari
India
Noor M Larik
Pakistan Surendra Pathak
India
Zia-ul-Islam
Pakistan
Subhash Chandra India
Waheed Ahmad
Pakistan
Bhushan Dewan India
Pravat Kumar
Dhal
India Ashok
Tholana India
Maitreyee Bardhan Roy
India
Markandey Rai
India
Leo Semashko
Russia
Latif Kirmani India
Vera
Popovich Russia
Ravi Bhatia
India
Victor Danilov Russia
Theodore Mascarenhas
India
Boris Resjabek Russia
T.S.Chandrashekar
South Korea
Alexander Semashko Russia
Rosa Dalmiglio
Italy
AlexanderLadugin
Russia
Rene Wadlow
France
Michael Ellis
Austral
ia Marнa
Cristina Azcona
Argentina
Daurenbek Aubakir
Kazakhstan
Habyarimana Heli
Rwanda
Guy Crequie
France
Rudolf Siebert
USA
TOTAL: 17 «PRO»
Of 8 countries
TOTAL: 13
«CONTRA»
Of 5 countries
The entire spectrum of opinions (with the exception of a few slurred
remarks) is published chronologically on the project page. Unfortunately, there
are no responses among them regarding the project content or its motivation by
any peacemaking values and principles. The whole discussion revolved around
the political expediency and usefulness of this project from the point of view
of the national interests of India and Pakistan. This key motivation was
defined by directly opposing assessments of the Article 370 abolition from the
India Constitution by the GHA Pakistani members, who evaluated it extremely
negatively (Umer Zia and others) and by the GHA Indian members, who rated it
extremely commendable, positive and impeccable (Sanjay Tewari et al.).
Unfortunately, nothing other than mutual harshness, threats and unsubstantiated
propaganda statements in their political nationalist tendentiousness, the
discussion did not give and did not enrich the project peacemaking conten
t.The priority in this discussion was national politics instead of a common
peace. It leads to the paradoxical thought that the two peoples and governments
prefer to continue fighting with each other for more 73 years than to seek an
acceptable peace among themselves in Kashmir. Of course, this is the choice and
the right of the peoples and governments of India and Pakistan, into which
others have no right to invade, as a sacred right of sovereignty and
non-interference in internal affairs. Unfortunately, our Indian colleagues
especially trumped and even threatened by this.Another sad conclusion is that
only two GHA members (from Australia and Kazakhstan) used the key argument in
the proof of our peacemaking project - the Sociological Questionnaire of 22
elementary questions. What level of peacemaking intelligence and peaceful
interest confirms this fact of our discussion is clear without comment. This is
a very low level, reflecting the low value of peace and peacemaking projects i
n the militaristic world order, which does not initiate, finance or discuss
them anywhere. Unfortunately, it remains even in the GHA that our discussion
confirmed. But it is not useless. The discussion and voting of the project
became a good sociological experiment in the GHA, which determined the measure,
quality and level of peacemaking in it in extremely difficult international
situations of a militaristic world order and its hegemony.The GHA refusal from
this project is not absolute and eternal. The project was created, approved by
the GHA by a majority votes. It will wait for better times when there are
peacemaking governmental or non-governmental organizations in the interested
countries that can take the GHA peace project "Gandhica-Kashmir" and
use it in any way and form. With this, we carried out the GHA peacemaking
mission without raping the today’s national interests of these countries
and their groups in the GHA.On this we put an end to this project. Now w
e are returning to the GHA initial topical agenda related to the promotion of
our unique peace book "Gandhica" in the remaining months of the GHA
jubilee "World Gandhi Year". This agenda will be discussed in the
following days.Best wishes for peace from harmony / non-violence in Kashmir and
worldwide,Dr. Leo Semashko
Dr Leo Semashko:-State Councillor of St.
Petersburg, Russia; RANH Professor;-Philosopher, Sociologist and
Peacemaker from Harmony;-Global Harmony Association (GHA) Founder
(2005) and Honorary President (2016);-Director,
GHA Website "Peace from Harmony": www.peacefromharmony.org;-Global
Peace Science (GPS) from
Harmony (616
pages):http://peacefromharmony.org/docs/global-peace-science-2016.pdf;-SPHERONS ;
as GPS Center (20 pages):
http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=423;-NO TO USA WAR WITH ;
RUSSIA:http://diy.rootsaction.org/petitions/no-to-war-hot-or-cold-with-russia;
“THE WAR KILLED MY FATHER, AND I KILLED WAR”:-Personal
page: http://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=253;-GHA Gandhi Book: ;
https://peacefromharmony.org/?cat=en_c&key=848
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Women's Global Harmony Association (WGHA)" group.To
unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
womengha+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/womengha/761064020.5876853.1566139986802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
