[geocentrism] Re: The ultimate goal
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:11:43 +0100
Dear Neville,
Amen.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Neville Jones
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 4:04 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: The ultimate goal
Dear Jack,
Yes, the "ultimate goal" of an "evolutionary process" ought surely to be seen
as a contradiction. It's as if some evolutionists want to keep open the
possibility of design as some sort of insurance policy.
What I find sad is that the vast majority of people would not be moved if we
were to re-establish the central position of the World in the universe and make
it as universally taught as the heliocentric/Star Trek description. They would
simply prefer the fantasy, the lie, the lack of responsibility that the
geocentric system contradicts.
Still, must keep plodding on.
Neville
www.GeocentricUniverse.com
-----Original Message-----
From: jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:35:29 +0100
Dear Neville,
just in case you haven't read any of the material that Bernie flagged-up, I
thought that this telling piece evolutionary philosophy might be of interest to
you.
This quotation is by Darwinist writer, Roger Lewin:
The Copernican and Darwinian revolutions dislodged humans from a position
of centrality in the universe of things. Nevertheless, even if humans are
accepted as the product of an evolutionary process in common with other
species, it is still possible to view Homo sapiens as a special product of that
process and indeed as its ultimate goal.[i]
Where did the 'ultimate goal' come from? heliocentrism and Darwinism
clearly go together. Without heliocentrism Darwinism would never have got off
the ground.
Jack Lewis
www.classiccarartist.co.uk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Listen & Record Music from Internet Radio - Get Free Radio & MP3 Player &
Recorder
Learn more at www.inbox.com/radio
Other related posts:
