[geocentrism] Re: The ultimate goal

  • From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:11:43 +0100

Dear Neville,


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Neville Jones 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 4:04 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: The ultimate goal

  Dear Jack,

  Yes, the "ultimate goal" of an "evolutionary process" ought surely to be seen 
as a contradiction. It's as if some evolutionists want to keep open the 
possibility of design as some sort of insurance policy.

  What I find sad is that the vast majority of people would not be moved if we 
were to re-establish the central position of the World in the universe and make 
it as universally taught as the heliocentric/Star Trek description. They would 
simply prefer the fantasy, the lie, the lack of responsibility that the 
geocentric system contradicts.

  Still, must keep plodding on.



    -----Original Message-----
    From: jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    Sent: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:35:29 +0100

    Dear Neville,
    just in case you haven't read any of the material that Bernie flagged-up, I 
thought that this telling piece evolutionary philosophy might be of interest to 

    This quotation is by Darwinist writer, Roger Lewin:

    The Copernican and Darwinian revolutions dislodged humans from a position 
of centrality in the universe of things. Nevertheless, even if humans are 
accepted as the product of an evolutionary process in common with other 
species, it is still possible to view Homo sapiens as a special product of that 
process and indeed as its ultimate goal.[i]

    Where did the 'ultimate goal' come from? heliocentrism and Darwinism 
clearly go together. Without heliocentrism Darwinism would never have got off 
the ground.

    Jack Lewis


  Listen & Record Music from Internet Radio - Get Free Radio & MP3 Player & 
  Learn more at www.inbox.com/radio

Other related posts: