[geocentrism] Re: Point number 2
- From: "w.mackey" <w.mackey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:37:16 -0000
Thanks Cheryl, yours is the first post I have understood for days!
Wendy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cheryl" <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 1:47 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Point number 2
> Wendy -- Dr. Jones, I believe, is making the point that the heliocentrists
> had to attach TWO separate movements to the earth in order to explain away
> the geostatic (nonspinning) and geocentric (non-orbiting) earth. I think
> he'd also go further than this to say that the more significant motion was
> that of the earth spinning. When the helios did this, they added two
> motions to the earth to explain away what our eyes are telling us and what
> the Bible also tells us is happening -- i.e. that the earth is not
turning,
> and that the earth is the center of the universe.
>
> Gary could explain this better than I am.
>
> Cheryl
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "w.mackey" <w.mackey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 5:50 AM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Point number 2
>
>
> > Please forgive my ignorance but I haven't a clue what point number 2
> > means?
> >
> > Please would you explain what you are saying in very simple terms, maybe
> > this forum is completely over my head............
> > Diagrams might help...........
> >
> > Wendy
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2005 2:26 AM
> > Subject: [geocentrism] Point number 2
> >
> >
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> We seem to be edging towards agreement on another key issue in our
> > understanding, so I wish to put forward point number 2:
> >>
> >> 2. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THAT WHAT IS OBSERVED IS ONLY AN ILLUSION, THE
> > HELIOCENTRIC MODEL MUST ASSIGN AT LEAST TWO DISTINCT MOTIONS TO THE
WORLD.
> > SINCE THESE MOTIONS ARE CALCULATED TO FIT OBSERVATIONAL FACTS, IT
FOLLOWS
> > THAT A GEOSTATIC COSMOS MUST BE EQUIVALENT IN APPEARANCE TO A
HELIOCENTRIC
> > ONE.
> >>
> >> Feel free to ask questions and/or disagree (this is not a straw poll on
> > the Emperor's new suit). And, in the absence of any such disagreement, I
> > will assume that the point is accepted.
> >>
> >>
> >> 1. IN BIBLICAL COSMOLOGY, THE WORLD DOES NOT ROTATE.
> >>
> >> Website www.midclyth.supanet.com
> >>
> >> Neville.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Send instant messages to your online friends
> >> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.3 - Release Date: 15/03/05
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.3 - Release Date: 15/03/05
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.3 - Release Date: 15/03/05
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.3 - Release Date: 15/03/05
Other related posts:
