[geocentrism] Re: Fw: Celestial poles and Badastronomy
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jandj.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:46:56 +0100
Dear Philip,
Yes you are correct. I have prepared 2 drawings showing this motion which I
have attached as a jpeg files.One shows precession and the other
non-precession.
Jack
PS Did you manage to sort out your spell checker?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 5:47 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Celestial poles and Badastronomy
> Neville said,
> ******** I'm not talking about the precession of the equinoxes, but the
> alleged change in axis orientation during the World's supposed 12-month
> orbit of the Sun. ********
>
> I may be dimb here, but does not the axis of the earth remain constant as
it
> orbits the sun? This means, to my graphic mind, that the gographical pole
> will always point to the same direction. and if a stationary star/stars
was
> out there, it would appear to make a circular motion. Isn't that what
> happens?
>
> Philip.
>
>
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: image/jpeg
-- File: Polaris jpeg 2.JPG
Other related posts:
