[geocentrism] An alternative science.
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <TraditionalCatholicsUnited@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "John Kaminski" <skylax@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "geocentrism list" <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ABCs of Faith" <abcsofffaith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:51:40 +1000
Scientist forced into a U-Turn
By Jonathan Gray
"We've made an awful mistake!"
Dismay was in Dean's voice. "A student has knocked our theory to bits!"
Dr Dean Kenyon, Professor of Biology (Emeritus) at San Francisco State
University, was one of the leading chemical evolution theorists in the world.
He co-authored "Biochemical Predestination," which claimed:
1. that the evolution of life was inevitable.
2. that proteins to produce living cells were formed directly by forces of
attraction between their parts.
3. that proteins are just formed together (self-assemble) in chains, directly
from amino acids, without any DNA assembly instructions.
His theory was accepted with enthusiasm by the evolutionary scientific
community. But within just five years after publishing, Kenyon suddenly had
serious doubts.
It began when one of his students asked, "How could the first proteins have
been assembled without the help of genetic instructions?" (Proteins were the
necessary information to build the first cell).
And then DNA was discovered. This would prove fatal to Kenyon's molecular
evolution theory. Kenyon confesses, "The more I conducted my own studies,
including a period of time at NASA-AIMS Research Center, the more it became
apparent there were multiple difficulties with the chemical evolution account.
"And further experimental work showed that amino acids do not have the ability
to order themselves into any biologically meaningful sequences.
"The more I thought about the alternative that was being presented in the
criticism, and the enormous problem that all of us who had worked on this field
had neglected to address, the problem of the origin of genetic information
itself, then I really had to re-assess my whole position regarding origins"
(Unlocking the Mysteries of Life).
What he now had to address was this: What was the source of the biological
information in DNA?
"If one could get at the origin of the messages, the encoded messages within
the living machinery, then you would really be onto something far more
intellectually satisfying than this chemical evolution theory." (Ibid.)
The astonishing fact is that inside every microscopic-sized cell, machines work
together to accomplish specific jobs and are shepherded by other specially
shaped machines to precise locations where they are needed.
Learning this, Kenyon exclaimed, "This is absolutely mind-boggling, to perceive
at this scale of size, such a finely tuned apparatus, a device, that bears the
marks of intelligent design and manufacture!"
Observable Evidence of a Master Designer
This is observable evidence of thoughtful, programmed designing by some
Superior Mind. Evidence of intelligently organized patterns.
Music in Genes
Something else. Did you know this? It was recently discovered that DNA is
linked to music!
If you like music, but think that you can't carry a tune, you may be wrong.
Respected geneticist, Susumo Ono, believes he's discovered music in genes -
particularly human genes, fish genes and rabbit genes. Susumo is a researcher
in DNA.
He asked himself, If we were to assign a musical note to each chemical on the
DNA strand and string those notes together and play them, what would DNA sound
like?
So he did this - and the result was amazing.
He discovered musical patterns of notes, that again reveal intelligence.
Susumo Ono was so astonished that he took his findings to musicians.
And musicians, in turn, were astonished to hear echoes of Bach, of Schubert, of
Mozart in DNA music.
Using the same formula for converting DNA into music, Dr. Ono worked backwards
and translated Chopin's funeral march into chemical symbols. It came out
cancer!
Skeptics naturally point out that these strands of DNA produce only a string of
single notes; it is the musicians who fill in the rhythm and the harmony.
But the bottom line is this: Whichever way you look at it, the PATTERNS of
single notes testify to intelligence as the source of DNA.
Certainly it is not from a blind, accidental force in nature.
Identical to Written Language
But there's more, much more.
Scientists at Bell Laboratories conducted studies on the mathematical language
in the DNA molecule.
And what did they find? Its mathematical pattern is identical to that of
conversational language.
Concerning DNA, Charles Thaxton states:
"A structural identity has been discovered between the genetic message on DNA
and the written messages of a human language" (Charles Thaxton, "A New Design
Argument," Cosmic Pursuit 1, no. 2, Spring 1998).
Hupert Yockey explains:
"There is an identity of structure between DNA (and protein) and written
linguistic messages.
"Since we know by experience that intelligence produces written messages, and
no other cause is known, the implication, according to the adductive method, is
that intelligent cause produced DNA and protein.
"The significance of this result lies in the security of it, for it is much
stronger than if the structures were merely similar.
"We are not dealing with anything like a superficial resemblance between DNA
and a written text.
"We are not saying DNA is like a message. Rather, DNA is a message. True design
thus returns to biology" (Hubert P. Yockey, "Journal of Theoretic Biology").
Since there is no doubt in anyone's mind it takes intelligence to write a
language, it is evident that it took intelligence to write the DNA code.
Intelligently designed 'Sentences' impressed from the Outside
Dean Kenyon was asked if DNA comes in intelligently designed 'sentences'.
INTERVIEWER: "And is it true that when scientists peer into the microscopic
world of DNA, they find not mere random arrangements, but well-written
'instruction books'?"
KENYON: "Yes. Masterpieces of immense intricacy and subtlety."
INTERVIEWER: "And you argue that these biological 'sentences' in DNA could not
have arisen merely by material means, as evolutionists suggest?"
KENYON: "No. Just as the chemistry and physics of ink and paper do not
determine the order of symbols in a printed text, but that order must be
impressed on the ink from the 'outside', so also the order of the bases, or
sub-units, in DNA [adenine, thymine, guanine, and cytosine, or A, T, G, and C
as commonly represented] is not determined by the known chemical tendencies of
these individual sub-units, but instead appears to have been impressed from the
'outside' on the sub-units to create just those sequences that make biological
sense.
The fantastic complexity and orderliness of the DNA code - condensed into an
incredibly tiny size - suggests the work of a brilliant intellect rather than
chance processes.
It suggests that much thought has gone into their design - just as human beings
use intelligence to design and construct computers, Jumbo jets, space craft and
other intricate equipment.
If radio signals were to be received from outer space, they would be understood
as evidence of an intelligent source.
Why then should we not regard the message sequence on the DNA molecule as prima
facie evidence of an intelligent source?
Designed not to Evolve
But that is not all! Gene code letters have built in error protection!
Genes store information in long strings of DNA, in the form of chemical
letters, called A, T, C and G.
So that genes can be accurately copied, each gene consists of two parallel
strands of DNA held together by links between the code letters of one strand
and those of the other strand.
The two strands are not identical. That is, A's do not link to A's, and so on.
Instead, they are complimentary. A's always link to T's; C's always link to G's.
Donail MacDonaill of Trinity College, Dublin, studied that pattern of linkages
between letters.
And he found that they form a parity code similar to computer codes, to
minimize mistakes during the electronic transfer of information (Nature Science
Update, www.nature.com/nsu September 18, 2002).
Now is the moment of truth. No one would be so naïve as to believe modern
electronic parity codes could have evolved by chance. They were carefully
planned by software designers.
The parity code found in DNA is further evidence the genetic code was
deliberately created.
It also reminds us that DNA is designed to maintain accurate copies and avoid
changes in the information it carries.
This means it was designed to NOT evolve. But rather to reproduce its own kind
forever (Genesis 1:11).
Come to think of it, wouldn't that make evolution scientifically impossible?
Did you know that:
a.. our scientific thought guardians have rewritten history to present a
one-sided account of our origins?
b.. the scientific elite has suppressed knowledge about fossils, biology and
dating systems that, if known, would destroy evolution theory?
c.. the scientific Establishment has tolerated fraud and employed horrific
methods to keep this knowledge hidden?
d.. science textbooks have been promoted by men who possessed a political
agenda. . . to solidify their own power base?
You are about to discover skeletons in locked cupboards, bones in forbidden
places and secrets hidden under the carpet.
And you won't believe the immensity of this MULTI-MILLION-DOLLAR COVER- UP!
In pursuing this scandal, I also stumbled upon a number of fascinating
trivialities, such as these:
* Did you hear that in West Virginia, coal miners a mile below ground came upon
an air pocket containing coalified human bodies - in "200 million year old"
coal? And that soon after, the spot was permanently flooded!
* Were you aware that your body has 100 trillion walled cells? And that each
single cell is as complicated as New York City, with energy generators,
transport systems, waste disposal systems, structural designers, invasion
guards, food factories, protective barriers and communication links - all
crammed into a space less than a thousandth of an inch long.
* And how about this? Good grade black coal has been produced at the Argonne
National Laboratories in Illinois from simple heating of wood in only 28 days.
* Have you heard about those clever European spiders that construct houses
under the sea? Not only do those tiny creatures link the separate houses with a
waterproof tunnel, but then they go back and forth to the surface, until they
have filled the underwater houses with air.
* Did you know that in Antelope Springs, Utah, in 1968, William Meister
uncovered a trilobite in the heel of a human sandal print in "440 year old"
Cambrian rock?
* Were you aware that inside every cell of your body, microscopic-sized
machines assemble new machines? And they interact with other machines to
accomplish specific jobs which require great intelligence. Although each
machine is never taught - because it has not a nerve cell or a brain in its
body - it knows exactly what to do.
* Did you hear what happened in Glen Rose, Texas, on August 13, 1989? Faced
with 70 human footprints crisscrossing 478 dinosaur tracks, two men with an
iron bar, tried to destroy the evidence.
* And catch this! With no glue or suction mechanism, geckos can walk upside
down across ceilings. And how do they do it? They use atomic forces -
attraction between atoms! Microscopic hairs on their toes directly attach to
molecules in the walking surface.
* Have you heard? "65 million year old" dinosaurs examined in 1990 at Montana
State University had not yet completely fossilized and they contained red blood
cells that cannot survive more than a few thousand years.
* DNA code comes in intelligently designed "sentences" identical to human
language in well-written "instruction books".
* And did you know that numerous scientists systematically FALSIFY DATES of
ancient remains?
* Surprise! In El Boqueron, Colombia in 1971, Professor Henero Henao Marin
exposed a 65-foot skeleton of a dinosaur next to a human skull?
* "Archaeoraptor" (a creature with the body of a bird and the tail of a small
dinosaur) "discovered" in China in 1999 was announced as "important" evidence
of evolution. After it sold for $51,000 it was found to be a fraud fossil -
stuck together from parts of unrelated creatures.
* And you'd better believe it! Mathematicians assure us that our existence on
earth is so unlikely, it's as though we had won a million-dollar lottery a
million times in a row.
Could this be why Soren Lovtrup, Professor of Embryology, University of Umea,
Sweden, stated: "I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the
greatest deceit in the history of science. When this happens, many people will
pose the question: how did this ever happen?" nl468.htm
These files will interest you: Giant Humans and Dinosaurs and Living Dinosaurs
from Anglo-Saxon and other Early Records.
Other related posts:
