[geocentrism] Re: Airplanes and the atmosphere
- From: "Cheryl" <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:56:38 -0500
Wendy -- Dr. Jones has proofs on his website. Check out
http://www.midclyth.supanet.com/page4.htm
Airy's Failure (Or success depending on your point of view) -- Proved the
earth is not moving, traveling zero mph, not spinning. How? I've not
organized my thoughts enough and don't completely understand it well enough
myself -- but it has to do with the need to adjust your umbrella (or
telescope), point it forward, when you're mvoing into the rain (or the light
from the stars). Obviously if you're not moving you don't need to adjust
your umbrella (or telescope). Airy's Failure proved that we don't need to
adjust our telescope to see the stars, proving that we're not moving.
Then there's Dr. Jones proof about the poles. The helios tell us that the
reason why it LOOKS as though the stars are all turning around the earth is
because our earth is spinning, that our axis is pointed at all times to the
North Star, and that it's all an optical illusion, this appearance of the
stars (the celestial sphere) revolving around the earth once a day. Dr.
Jones proves how laughable that is -- that the south pole would be sticking
out all over the place, and that in order for the north pole of the earth to
be constantly pointing to the North Star while supposedly orbiting
completely around the Sun that we'd have to be dragging all the stars around
with us. Ha. That kind of puts the nail in that coffin, doesn't it?
There's more. It's not as simple as the peaceful clouds and how come we
don't shave off time when we travel against the rotation of the earth. The
only reason the helios get away with their nonsense is because in their
model a lot of the math works out exactly the same as in the geostatic
(nonspinning earth) model.
If you send me your address, I will send you a copy of Dr. Jones' CD --
Geocentric Universe. It's great and shows a lot in pictures that words
can't. His son Steven is a musician/composer and the music background is
original composition by Steven -- beautiful. I'd love to send you a copy if
you'd like me to.
God bless.
Cheryl
----- Original Message -----
From: "w.mackey" <w.mackey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 3:31 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Airplanes and the atmosphere
> Hi I've recently joined the group and find all the concepts discussed
> fascinating.
> An observation about the 'ball in the car'.......how high will you throw
> the
> ball...........one foot?
> What if you sat in the back of a moving pick-up and threw the ball 10 feet
> in the air........I would suggest you'd have no chance of catching it
> again.
> I agree with Cheryl...........air travel and unmoving clouds suggest to my
> simple mind that the earth is not moving.
>
> I now feel pretty stupid for believing lies for so long.........but then I
> was taught all this, and evolution too, as truth.
>
> I am also completely convinced that only the Holy Spirit will lead those
> to
> this truth, to whom He wishes to reveal it..........so there's no need for
> us to strive to get the message out.......just be ready to give an answer.
>
> Wendy
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cheryl" <c.battles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 10:16 PM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Airplanes and the atmosphere
>
>
>> Gary -- I read back over your postings from way before I came on board,
>> hoping to find an answer to the same question you were posing earlier. I
>> didn't find any answer, so maybe it would be okay to keep on with the
>> question?
>>
>> I've been told the answer lies with the throwing the ball up in the air
>> while you're riding in the car, that the ball is still going the same
>> rate
>> of speed (inertia).
>>
>> But I just don't get it. How can you fly from California to New York and
>> not expect to knock off a lot of time in your trip since you are
> travelling
>> against the rotation of the earth? That's a lot of time for inertia to
> be
>> working, yes?
>>
>> Somebody explained this in the earlier airplane by saying that if you're
> on
>> a moving merry-go-round that it takes the same amount of time to go a
>> quarter of the way around in either direction. Not if you're a
> hummingbird
>> flying in the opposite direction that the merry-go-round is turning, or
> not
>> if you are a remote controlled toy airplane somebody is sending against
> the
>> rotation of the merry-go-round.
>>
>> I just don't get it.
>>
>> Cheryl
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.0 - Release Date: 02/03/05
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.0 - Release Date: 02/03/05
>
>
Other related posts:
