[geocentrism] Re: APOLOGY to all and Regna/Neville.
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:21:39 +1000
Thanks Bernie, and my apologies to Regner..
Phlip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie Brauer
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:06 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: APOLOGY to all and Regna/Neville.
Should be Regner, not Regna:
http://www.meaning-of-baby-names.com/babynames/meaning.php?display=160&i=r&search_name=&gender=male
: ~ )
Bernie
philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This was quick not vetted and after my happy 4 hours.. hope it is
coherent..
I feel bad about dominating the list with my debate with Allen. As my
inbox fills each day it occured to me that others are distracted and
discouraged from inputting.
I am sorry . I do not want to use this list to blow my own trumpet. And
sometimes it seems that this is what I do..
Especially to me when my posts come back and I scrutinise them for errors.
I do that in advance, but it amazes me the number I miss.
Neville I am worried that you are so quiet. I very much value your inputs,
no matter how wild they are. I like wild. That in scientific terminology is
called lateral thinking.. If Edison and Tesla! didn't think laterally, we
wouldn't have the light bulb or any real trnsmission of electrical power as we
have today. (From our souls point of view , that might have been a good thing)
Regna this might sound cruel, and believe me I do not intend cruelty, as I
admire your patience and effort that you have put into explainig the cosmos
from your viewpoint, and the discussions relating to geocentrism; but if you
follow your indoctrination, you are not a lateral thinker such as were these
mental giants , but a follower of concensus.
They were not followers and I hope niether am I . This does not mean
denying the principles scientific concensus established. It means looking for
loopholes and alternate ways or being open to those who do.
Ignoring Lateral thinking puts you in the same category as all those who
would not accept Edison, or Tesla back then, in todays world, against any
alternative. Not forgetting that in their separate fields Edison with DC
opposed the AC of Tesla.
That is my point. Truth will out by lateral thinking, fair competition, and
no power of concensus.
That you have joined this group, if your motives were to promote truth and
a willingness to examine alternatives to your indoctrination, I am your best
friend here. ..Well almost maybe.
You have yet to come back in answer to our most logical rejection of your
fragile support of a Null result of the MM experiments.. This indeed requires
an open lateral thinking mind.
Philip.,
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.12/1372 - Release Date: 10/04/2008
5:36 PM
Other related posts:
