[geocentrism] Re: APOLOGY to all and Regna/Neville.
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:15:46 +1000
I haven't even replied to Sungenis' post, and you almost declare
Geocentrism a winner - Hold your horses, Philip.
- Regner
No Regner I had not given up on you that easily. But I had thought we might
have given you much more to consider than you had bargained for.. yet I have
observed mistakes (by all protagonists over the years) on both sides of this
question. (deep down I believe its a mystery only God can explain.)
Re engineering! I am convinced engineering came before science. Someone made a
boat.. science had to figure out why it floated before the Priests used it as
proof in the power of God.. (grin)
Perhaps my bad experience, was yes in Australia. I have observed professors in
action, and yes they aint like Julius Sumner Millar. If you disagree with the
"blackboard", they fail you. This is the modern American influence, and I do
not have any reason to ascribe it to European countries or people like
yourself. After all, you ozonate your drinking water and do not drink chlorine.
Looking forward to your answers, and I let the horses loose years ago.
Philip..
----- Original Message -----
From: Regner Trampedach
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 1:30 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: APOLOGY to all and Regna/Neville.
Sorry I have been absent for so long - it was entirely unrelated to this
forum.
Also I have not been able to keep up with the avalanche of posts since April
3rd,
so my apologies if I have missed something important - Pointing out a post I
should have read, would be considered helpful...
philip madsen wrote:
Thanks Bernie, and my apologies to Regner..
Thanks - and no worries.
Philip, you do however, have a very strange picture of how science is taught
at universities - might it be from your own experience in engineering school?
Engineers apply the science found by scientists, so the way scientists and
engineers are taught, should obviously be quite different.
I haven't even replied to Sungenis' post, and you almost declare
Geocentrism a winner - Hold your horses, Philip.
- Regner
Phlip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernie Brauer
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:06 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: APOLOGY to all and Regna/Neville.
Should be Regner, not Regna:
http://www.meaning-of-baby-names.com/babynames/meaning.php?display=160&i=r&search_name=&gender=male
: ~ )
Bernie
philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This was quick not vetted and after my happy 4 hours.. hope it is
coherent..
I feel bad about dominating the list with my debate with Allen. As my
inbox fills each day it occured to me that others are distracted and
discouraged from inputting.
I am sorry . I do not want to use this list to blow my own trumpet.
And sometimes it seems that this is what I do..
Especially to me when my posts come back and I scrutinise them for
errors. I do that in advance, but it amazes me the number I miss.
Neville I am worried that you are so quiet. I very much value your
inputs, no matter how wild they are. I like wild. That in scientific
terminology is called lateral thinking.. If Edison and Tesla! didn't think
laterally, we wouldn't have the light bulb or any real trnsmission of
electrical power as we have today. (From our souls point of view , that might
have been a good thing)
Regna this might sound cruel, and believe me I do not intend cruelty,
as I admire your patience and effort that you have put into explainig the
cosmos from your viewpoint, and the discussions relating to geocentrism; but if
you follow your indoctrination, you are not a lateral thinker such as were
these mental giants , but a follower of concensus.
They were not followers and I hope niether am I . This does not mean
denying the principles scientific concensus established. It means looking for
loopholes and alternate ways or being open to those who do.
Ignoring Lateral thinking puts you in the same category as all those
who would not accept Edison, or Tesla back then, in todays world, against any
alternative. Not forgetting that in their separate fields Edison with DC
opposed the AC of Tesla.
That is my point. Truth will out by lateral thinking, fair competition,
and no power of concensus.
That you have joined this group, if your motives were to promote truth
and a willingness to examine alternatives to your indoctrination, I am your
best friend here. ..Well almost maybe.
You have yet to come back in answer to our most logical rejection of
your fragile support of a Null result of the MM experiments.. This indeed
requires an open lateral thinking mind.
Philip.,
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.12/1372 - Release Date:
10/04/2008 5:36 PM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1375 - Release Date: 12/04/2008
11:32 AM
Other related posts:
