[GeoStL] Re: TREEmendous caches after September 30
- From: Glenn <gln.htc@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:07:47 -0500
Why would the caches have to be relocated or archived just because the signs
are gone? The info about the tree could be placed on the cache page. Even with
no info it's still a cache by a tree.
Via iP-4
On Sep 30, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Tom Wolpert <tom_wolpert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To all of you who have inquired about this series:
>
> The Missouri Botanical Garden would like to keep the caches in the
> TREEmendous series in place. They have heard from most of the land managers.
> All those who have replied have agreed to leave the signs and caches in
> place. They expect agreement from the others as well. However, MBG does not
> intend to repair or replace signs which are damaged or lost. The net result
> is that the caches in the series will likely remain until something happens
> to the associated signs. At that point, individual cache owners will relocate
> or archive the affected caches.
>
> BTW, thanks to all the SLAGA members who agreed to own these caches. And to
> all of you who've come out to visit them. Hope you enjoyed the trees!
>
> Tom
Other related posts:
