[GeoStL] Re: Milestones - How do you do them?
- From: Michael Rogers <mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Well, I do have a reason. I am planning for MOGA 2013 to be my #3,000. I have
47 caches to find before logging the event proper for the milestone. The route
I have chosen will make it easy to do without gaming the number in any way, but
choosing slightly different routes will net me more caches, but would
necessitate me logging MOGA when it comes to cache #3,000 before continuing on.
I lean to doing what I have done in the past and log them as they truly are,
but I was just curious what others do...
________________________________
From: Susan Ring <susanmring@xxxxxxx>
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 1:52 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Milestones - How do you do them?
Are you just curious or are you planning something?
Anyway, I've only had one big milestone at 1000 (although #100 meant a lot to
me). I wanted it to be the Slurpin' Soup event. I attended the event and
found some other caches all on the same day. It wasn't exactly #1000 but when I
logged the group of caches for that day I logged them in the order that would
make the event 1000.
At the rate I cache I won't have to worry about another milestone for a LONG
time.
Susan
On Mar 16, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Michael Rogers wrote:
Just a quick, non-angsty question for my fellow SLAGA folks...
>
>If you approach a larger milestone (like 1,000, 2,000, etc.) and you have a
>specific cache or event planned for it, are you one more likely to:
>
>1. Be strict in keeping that cache as that number, meaning that you will
>stifle some caching, if necessary, to accomplish that goal precisely, or
>
>2. Still seek to log the cache or event as the milestone, but are willing to
>log some caches out of order to do that, just so you can still cache as you
>want.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
