[GeoStL] Re: Curious and I am sure controversial (REVISITED)
- From: "Mike Griffin" <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 23:14:04 -0600
-
Dan, the problem was that the script would not work after the changes to
GC.COM. The member benefits really don't mention the stats. It use to say
that they would be available to paying members but it was not a benefit and
could disappear at any time. I know a lot of people liked this feature, but,
it was a hassle for Paul every time they changed GC.COM. So in a nutshell,
unless someone else wants to write a script, they probably will not return..
Mike
Tired of Spam??
Here's your solution..
See: http://www.spamarrest.com/affl?4001050
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Henke" <thunder_monk@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:45 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Curious and I am sure controversial (REVISITED)
> -
> When I posted this query I figured it would start a conversation and
> possibly get a few negative as well as positive comments but I did not
> realize I would get 3 comments about the original contents and then a
> huge offshoot on MOGA.
>
> So I guess I will ask the question again: Is the "member stats" portion
> of the SLAGA home page a dead issue? One of the reasons I signed up and
> paid my dues was to get this feature which I did for ONE day and then it
> quit working and finally was removed from the webpage. A simple yes or no
> answer would suffice though it would be nice to know why.
>
> I know there are a couple of other sites that list cachers with 200 or
> more caches and I guess that is ok but I enjoyed seeing where I stood in
> the local caching community and one of my goals was to keep myself in the
> top 20 or 30 cachers from the SLAGA area....that is very difficult when
> you are seeing cachers from all over the country.
>
> I guess there is not a big interest on the part of SLAGA members though
> I do remember several posts asking what had happened so maybe I am just
> beating a dead horse.
>
> As far as the milestones page is concerned I enjoy seeing what
> milestones people have achieved though because of the negative criticism
> from a few in the newsgroup there is no big round of congratulations
> anymore. But the milestones don't show me what I want to see and THAT is
> my complaint.
>
> Dan (Thunder)
>
> Who is causing trouble again :-P
>
>
>
> Brad Myers <bmyers88@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: -
> http://grand_high_pobah.home.comcast.net/AllFinds.html
>
> I know it isn't the stats that we use to have, but you can look and see
> how
> you compare with all the cachers that have over 200 finds.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dan Henke
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 12:26 AM
> To: geocaching
> Subject: [GeoStL] Curious and I am sure controversial
>
> -
> Should I assume that since they have not come back that the "Member
> Stats"
> feature of the SLAGA web page is dead and not coming back?
>
> I used that feature a LOT not to compare myself to other cachers but to
> see how people were doing and who was cahing etc ...it was nice to see
> how
> many each of my friends had and how they did compare to mine...not in a
> jealous or envious way but just out of curiousity.
>
> And the talk I have seen about people not caring about stats is a bunch
> of bull...I would say that most cachers DO care about stats otherwise why
> do they log their finds? Also why do we congratulate someone on reaching
> X
> number of finds or throw a party when Bruce hit 1000, 2000 and 5000. I
> know
> there are exceptions but in general I would say they want and like them
>
> I care about mine and celebrate at each 100 caches that I find...maybe
> to
> people who have found over 1000 or 2000 it may not mean much but my 600+
> caches are well remembered and hard fought and by golly I am PROUD of the
> fact I have stuck with it so long and the number I have done reminds me
> of
> how hard and long a trip it has been.
>
> I also understand that it is a LOT of work and hassle for Paul to
> maintain and if he just does not want to maintain the feature then say so
> ...but considering it was one of those features advertised with the paid
> membership I would have thought that at least the first year it would be
> kept.
>
> I know this will probably open another can of worms ....it seems I am
> good at that but hey I would like to know as it seems to have just fallen
> by the wayside
>
> Dan (Thunder)
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail
> Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
> list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
> list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Brings words and photos together (easily) with
> PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.
>
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
> list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
Other related posts:
