[fruityloops] Re: Rendering?
- From: "Andy Ebling" <andyebling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <fruityloops@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:15:34 +0100
I tend to use less CPU intensive settings for rendering until I am fairly
happy with the mix, then I switch to the most CPU intensive settings (which
hopefully produce the best settings, although I haven't done any listening
tests) for the final render.
I have switched away from using fruity to convert to mp3, instead I save the
mix to a wav file and load it up in cool edit. This enables me to see if I
am making best use of the dynamic range available, and tweak things if
needed. I also add half a seconds silence to the start of the wav file at
this stage as some mp3 encoders seem to botch the first frame or so; if you
track starts right at the start of the wave, it can get the beginning
chopped off. I notice this on some of the tracks that I have downloaded
from sectionz.
Finally, I use WinLame to encode to mp3 on the best quality setting.
WinLame also has a lot more options to choose from, plus it can also produce
ogg files if you like that sort of thing :-).
Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sinatra Y2k" <sinatra_y2k@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <fruityloops@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:53 PM
Subject: [fruityloops] Rendering?
> When it comes time to render your tracks to Wav, what settings do you use?
To be honest, I haven't even really thought too much about this stuff at all
... I think I've been using the default settings. Any general guidelines?
>
> Sy2k
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
