Re: [foxboro] /usr/fox/wp/data/wp51_cmds

  • From: "Brown, Stanley" <stan.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:22:33 -0400

One thing that concerns me here is that since VNC starts another X server on 
the UNIX box, which is directed to the VNC session, it probably appears "local" 
to DM/Foxview.

Does this make sense?

Thus my desire to test some of these variables.

I am invoking a vt100 window from a pick in DM in the VNC session's DM, so it 
really should be the exact same thing as the DM sees, since the vr100 script is 
a child of the DM process.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stan Brown [mailto:stanb@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Terry Doucet
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:03 AM
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [foxboro] /usr/fox/wp/data/wp51_cmds
>
> Stan,
>
> The wp51_cmds will run for all display managers on this station whether
> remote or local.
>
> As Alex and others have stated, you can select a View_Only type of
> display manager for floating or assigned display managers in the dmcfg
> file and when started, the display manager will have the omsets
> disabled. Any environment change or command line (pref) can enable
> omsets on this display manager. Some users have a inactivity timeout so
> that with no keyboard or mouse activity for x minutes, the environment
> is changed back to Initial where omsets are disabled. If you select an
> Inital Display with zero connections, then all om connections should be
> released for this display manager.
>
> The key thing is that you need to prevent someone without a valid
> password environment like the engineers environment from accidentally
> changing this (View_Only) display manager back to omsets capability.
> The right-mouse click in FoxView has some selections that need to be
> deleted from environments where omsets are disabled. There may be
> others such as the command or cmd prompt in Windows. You need to pick
> everything in the protected environment to ensure that there is no link
> to enabling omsets.
>
> The VT-100 selection has different properties depending on where it is
> called from. For example, directly on the AW51 when you select VT100
> local, you get certain Unix variables  but when you are connected via
> Exceed on a PC and you select VT100 local, you do not get the same Unix
> variables as directly on the AW51. So when directly on an AW51 in VT100
> you may run progams that work as you intended but if you try to run the
> same program while sitting in front of a PC and Exceed connection to
> the AW51 VT100, the program may not work.
>
> Terry
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:06:38 -0500
> > From: stanb@xxxxxxxxx
> > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [foxboro] /usr/fox/wp/data/wp51_cmds
> >
> > I am trying to redesign how wee do remote access to our UNIX based DM
> and
> > oxview machines to acomodate some changes on the IT side.
> >
> > One of the things I need to acomplihs is make certain sessions
> started this
> > way have omsets disabled. I was pointed to the posibilty of doing
> this in
> > /usr/fox/wp/data/wp51_cmds.
> >
> > Looking at this file, it does look like this is a posible place to
> > acomplish this. However, i have never dealt with this file before, so
> I
> > have a couple of questions.
> >
> > It appears that this is a dmcmd script that is automaticaly executed
> whne a
> > DM sessions is started. s this correct?
> >
> > If so, is there a way I can evalute, from the command line, what a
> given
> > variable is that this script examines. For instance there is a line
> that I
> > beleive says "if the DM is not local disable omsts". it looks like
> this:
> >
> > == $DM_LOCAL N dmcmd disable clralm
> >
> > is his assumption correct?
> >
> > If so, can I test DM_LOCAL from a shell prompt (IE in a vt100
> window)? I
> > would have thought I could do this with omget, but if I can then I
> must not
> > know how to sue omget, which is posible.
> >
> > In addition, how can I determine what variables are available to test
> > against in this script?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> > A: Top-posting.
> > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
> Process
> > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here
> at
> > your own risks. Read
> http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> >
> > foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Stay in touch.
> http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid-12959
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>


The information contained in this message and any attached files may be 
privileged and/or confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not 
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of 
the information contained in or attached to this transmission is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please so notify 
the sender immediately without reading it. Also, please promptly destroy the 
original transmission and its attachments. Any views or opinions presented in 
this message or attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation or its subsidiaries.
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: