On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 04:25:22PM -0400, Jaime Claramunt R. (Inforsa) wrote: > Hi all... > > Does anybody now something about WoodHead Profibus-DP modules for SLC500 or > PLC5 ? I'm thinking for connecting to FBM223... > http://www.woodhead.com/products/automation/networkinterface/plcbackplacemod > ules/#2113 > > Compared to Prosoft Modbus-RTU module used in same way, which one can > perform "better" ? > http://www.prosoft-technology.com/content/view/full/5629 > We are in the process of installing our first PLC5 -> ProSoft -> GBM224 interface. Historicaly we have user Integrator 30's. So fare we have prototyped this using a test program on a PC to simulate the FBM224. Based upon this, and the reading of the FB$224 docs. This looks like it will be a huge preformance win over the older way. Modnus is pretty easy to diagnose, on the wire, if necessary. This looks very promising to us. -- U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong Terror - New York Times 9/3/1967 _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave