Re: [foxboro] Ladder Questions

  • From: "Scott Landry" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Scott.Landry" for DMARC)
  • To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:21:15 +0000


  Brian,

From : B0700AG - Rev Z

The total number of ladder logic lines for all ladders in a given FBM needs to 
be less than 98.

The FBM can accommodate approximately 850 bytes of object code representing the 
ladder logic. 
This can support about 390 user-entered ladder symbols. (Straight line 
horizontal and vertical segments can be considered as using no memory.)

Ladder logic is executed rung by rung from top to bottom of the ladder. Ladders 
are executed at an average of 300 ladder logic symbols in 20 to 25 ms.


If an FBM241, Ladder1.OFL is used for input to FBM241, Ladder2.IFL, how fast 
would it see change?

Assuming the two ladders referred to above are in different FBM241s,  PLB block 
period + the ladder processing time (based upon where the IFL is in the ladder)


 
Scott Landry   |   Schneider Electric Systems, NA |   Process Automation   |   
United States   |   PRINCIPAL SITE SERVICE ENGINEER 



*** Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of 
Long, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 2:46 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] Ladder Questions

[External email: Use caution with links and attachments]

________________________________



Ladder running in an FBM241, using 99 rungs, scans at what speed?
If an FBM241, Ladder1.OFL is used for input to FBM241, Ladder2.IFL, how fast 
would it see change?

Thanks,
Brian




_________________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Schneider Electric 
(formerly The Foxboro Company).  Use the info you obtain here at your own 
risks.  See the disclaimer at 
https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thecassandraproject.org%2Fdisclaimer.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7CScott.Landry%40se.com%7C503c4bca83ac42238e2d08d8282eb3aa%7C6e51e1adc54b4b39b5980ffe9ae68fef%7C0%7C0%7C637303528345622973&amp;sdata=MXgdqFYlLL6aL503mbRslGC4t4eKqXWUlpgXfXN4xn0%3D&amp;reserved=0

foxboro mailing list:               
https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freelists.org%2Flist%2Ffoxboro&amp;data=02%7C01%7CScott.Landry%40se.com%7C503c4bca83ac42238e2d08d8282eb3aa%7C6e51e1adc54b4b39b5980ffe9ae68fef%7C0%7C0%7C637303528345622973&amp;sdata=igXBQKbGfWBtK9uYfd1o7cgS25BhMNp0X4DIRbpJq3g%3D&amp;reserved=0
to subscribe:           mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:        mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________
 
 
_________________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Schneider Electric
(formerly The Foxboro Company).  Use the info you obtain here at your own
risks.  See the disclaimer at www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:               //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:           mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:        mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: