Re: [foxboro] FW: More future direction questions.
- From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:35:10 -0400
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 12:16:10PM -0400, Johnson, Alex P (IPS) wrote:
> Re: I seem to have gotten good answers to the first question here. How
> about the 2nd one?
>
> Would you please repeat it?
>
Sure, Given to "sub nodes" that is V7 systems that have seperate boot
hosts, cabinets, and switches, but are defined as a part of the same
"node", should we connect these with 100M between te switches, or 1G addres
to teh switches?
--
U.S. Encouraged by Vietnam Vote - Officials Cite 83% Turnout Despite Vietcong
Terror
- New York Times 9/3/1967
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
