Re: [foxboro] FW: FW: AW51D Problem
- From: "Kevin Fitzgerrell" <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:04:40 +0900
Pak Budi,
One more thought on the mutex fault - if this workstation can boot, do
an "mpstat 10 10" and post the result. I'm particularly interested in
the smtx column - mutex contention rate. A high count here should not
lead to the type of fault you experienced, but is indicative of mutex
lock activity.
Regards,
Kevin FitzGerrell
On 7/13/07, Kevin Fitzgerrell <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Pak Budi,
>
> Regarding the network interface error:
> What kind of WP51 is this? WP51A, B and C have le0 as on-board
> ethernet interface. WP51D and E have hme0 as on-board ethernet.
> WP51F has eri0 as on-board ethernet and hme0 as 2nd ethernet. On a
> 51D or 51E box it is common to have le0 errors as one or more of
> Foxboro's QFs have incorrectly caused le0 to be configured 51D/E
> workstations. If this is the case, the le0 error can be safely
> ignored.
>
> Regarding the panic:
> Was this a one-off fault or does this occur regularly?
> A panic from a recursive mutex_enter error means that something
> requested a locked object (mutex) that it was already using. Mutexes
> are not re-entrant by the same thread. If you already own the mutex,
> you cannot own it again. This is likely a software, driver or kernel
> problem. If you still have the crash files, consider asking Foxboro
> to do a panic and stack trace to see what software caused the fault.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kevin FitzGerrell
>
> On 7/13/07, budi t jatmiko <budi.tjatmiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I had similar problem, while rebooting WP51 message showed up :
> > Configuring network interfaces: hme0 hme1ifconfig: plum: le0: no such
> > interface
> >
> > Panic [cpu0]/thread=0x30023ec0: recursive mutex_enter: mutex 6003da20 caller
> > 10081d40
> > Syncing file system....
> > Fast Data Acces MMU Miss
> > Ok
> >
> > And the system back to reboot again
> > I read from sun solaris error message, le0 is a network card onboard
> > (motherboard?)
> > Until now we still trying to fix it but not solved.
> > What do you think about this problem?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Budi TJ
> > PERTAMINA's Dumai Refinery
> > Indonesia
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
