Re: [foxboro] FBM224-multiple slaves on one port
- From: "Kevin Fitzgerrell" <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:33:09 +0400
Corey,
Last time I looked at a similar project I didn't get specs until too
late, but it looked like the best solution would leave the starters
online with the breaker downstream. Ours had several parameters that
would have been convenient to monitor even while racked out.
Regards,
Kevin FitzGerrell
On 6/29/07, Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It is a potential future application, but I will start with 9 devices and
> could have up to 16. The devices are motor starters and so could fairly
> often be offline (breaker turned off). Even if I split them up amongst
> the ports, I'll still have >1 device per port. The data is not critical,
> but having a 5- or 10-second time delay on each scan due to offline
> devices could cause some operator indigestion.
>
> Corey Clingo
> BASF Corporation
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
