Re: [foxboro] Different FoxSelect views from different AWs

  • From: "Joseph M. Riccardi" <Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:14:29 -0800

Russ,

Reference the old e-mail thread below...

I see a similar situation with FoxSelect at this plant but with a weird
twist on all of the AWs, except the CSA and CP host AW; it's the only one
working correctly.  Just 4 CPs and they show up in the FoxSelect list but...
CP1 has CP4 Compounds listed, CP2 and CP3 Compounds look OK (I guess?), but
cannot even open CP4.  I checked all of the files you referenced below
(/etc/wpcplns & cplns, /etc/fox/wpcplns & cplns) and they list the 4 CPs.
Just to make sure I copied each file from the host AW to a non-host AW and
no help.  Also, it takes 10-20 seconds to call up a list of the Blocks in a
Compound, and another 10-20 seconds to call up a Block Detail Display.

Any ideas?


Joseph M. Riccardi
386-441-0250 Office
386-451-7607 Cell
 
Joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
"To give real service you must add something that cannot be bought or
measured with money; and that is sincerity and integrity." - Donald A. Adams



-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Boulay, Russ
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2014 9:01 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Different FoxSelect views from different AWs

Also check /etc/fox/wpcplns and cplns in both directories.....the refernces
have bounced around over the years

-----Original Message-----
From: Boulay, Russ 
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:46 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [foxboro] Different FoxSelect views from different AWs

Those listings come from files not CSA so different commits were used...or
someone manually edited the /etc/wpcplns file on each station

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Maizlin, Ilya [AT]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:24 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] Different FoxSelect views from different AWs

Hi, There.

Have the following situation was hoping to resolve.

We have a small offline system consisting of 8 AWs that has not been used
for a long time.
Each AW is hosting a small number of CPs (FCP270s).

When launching a FoxSelect on each AW, one would see different set of CPs
available in FoxSelect (depending on which AW they launch it from).
Similar effect is observed when using ICC.

The possibilities we are currently speculating on are:
        1) different SysDefs were used to commit each AW.
        2) a CSA conflict is observed within the system (more than 1 active
CSA server).

The system is an IA 8.4 with WindowsXP and FCP270s.

What would you suggest to look at in order to detect and rectify the root
cause.

Any insight will be appreciated.

Regards,

Ilya Maizlin.

_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your
own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
  
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your
own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 


*** Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including any associated or
attached files, is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it
is addressed. This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally
privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its
status. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete
this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any
purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. This email comes
from a division of the Invensys Group, owned by Invensys plc, which is a
company registered in England and Wales with its registered office at 3rd
Floor, 40 Grosvenor Place, London, SW1X 7AW (Registered number 166023). For
a list of European legal entities within the Invensys Group, please select
the Legal Entities link at invensys.com.


You may contact Invensys plc on +44 (0)20 3155 1200 or e-mail
reception@xxxxxxxxxxxx. This e-mail and any attachments thereto may be
subject to the terms of any agreements between Invensys (and/or its
subsidiaries and affiliates) and the recipient (and/or its subsidiaries and
affiliates).


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: