Re: [foxboro] Best Alarm Package for Ver 8 MESH
- From: Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:20:39 -0600
Yes, that's it, sort of. We usually see the first 2 characters of the
date/time stamp (i.e., "20" gone out of "2009") missing. But it's not in
the CAD--well, it may be there too, but it's not one of my systems so I
don't know. I actually see this in data returned using an ODBC query tool
against the AIM* database. That said, if it's in the CAD too, it could be
a problem with the alarm subsystem not feeding AIM* the proper data.
Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation
"Theobald, Martin" <martin.theobald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
02/02/2009 02:57 PM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [foxboro] Best Alarm Package for Ver 8 MESH
Corey.
If by "operator action messages get garbled" you mean that the first two
characters of a number of the (AIM* table) fields are lost then this is
the subject of CAR 1008305 - the problem probably lies with the Current
Alarm Display and not the historian. A QF has been available and has
been rolled into I/A ver. 8.4.2 . Further information is available via
the Global Client Support website http://support.ips.invensys.com .
Regards,
Martin Theobald
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
