This brings up a question I have. What am I uploading when I do an upload with FoxCAE 5.1 via the 2nd ethernet port? Is it the information from the files, or the contents of the CPs RAM? Does anyone know? Wally Magda IE&C Spec Sr Colorado Springs Utilities PO Box 214 660 W. Monument Creek Rd USAF Academy, CO 80840 719.668.9502 office wmagda@xxxxxxx "Pat Martens" Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 09/08/2005 02:25 PM Please respond to foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Re: [foxboro] Automated SaveAll Alex, Yes, that does make sense. So if any of the <cmpd>.O, <cpLbug>.O (which I would have forgotten) or the workfile (for a given control station) has a timestamp which is newer compared to my latest SaveAll, I should update the SaveAll. (right ?) Thanks ! Patrick Martens Total Raffinaderij Nederland N.V. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johnson, Alex P (IPS)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 10:05 PM Subject: Re: [foxboro] Automated SaveAll The workfile date will tell you when the workfile itself is change, i.e., when a block parameter is altered - generally by an UPLOAD or a human with the ICC, IACC, or ICC Driver Task. The <cmpd>.O files will tell you when blocks in a compound are added or deleted. The <cpLbug>.O file will tell you when compounds are added or deleted. Does that make sense? Regards, Alex Johnson Invensys Systems, Inc. 10707 Haddington Houston, TX 77063 +1 713 722 2859 (voice) +1 713 932 0222 (fax) +1 713 722 2700 (switchboard) alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I hope to see you at the Invensys Process System User Group meeting October 3-6 in Houston, TX - www.invensys.com/usergroup2005 -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pat Martens Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 2:28 PM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [foxboro] Automated SaveAll Hi, We have automated the creation of savealls for all our control stations. The basis for this is the Ron Deen / Marco van der Waal save_all.sh. This scripts creates 15 incremental back-ups. I used to compare the timestamp of the checkpoint file (.UC) and the latest save_all to see if a save_all would be needed but as we also have the auto checkpoint feature enabled we end up with creating a save_all every day. If within that 15 days nothing has changed we will have 15 identical save_all's. Therefore we recently modified things and now check the timestamp of the workfile (.wf). However, today I noticed the save_all was not updated after deleting several blocks with ICC. I found that the timestamp of the .wf was not changed, however the timestamp of the .O files of the compounds concerned was. Could I be sure to cover all ICC changes by checking the timestamp of the latest .O file for a given CP or should check both the .wf and/or the .O file (whichever is newer)? Any info appreciated, Patrick Martens Total Raffinaderij Nederland N.V. _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave