Dear List,
In an effort to streamline the FoxView display building process for a large
project, we've been experimenting with using library objects for all the
symbols (eg: pida, ain, gdev valves, motors, etc). This works great as you
can define all of the behaviour in the .m1 files and then just drop the
object and configure the aliases while enforcing the graphics standards to
be followed.
The problem that we're struggling with is that the display call up times
are prohibitively long. I have run tests with setting up a display using
both methods and all the same C:B.P. The call up time for a display without
library objects is < 0.5 sec, where as with the library objects it's over 3
seconds. This may sound short, but in actual usage, it is unbearable.
I've tested at IA 8.5 as well as IA 9.2 with FV 10.4.2 QF1269588
Any ideas or comments would be greatly appreciated, thank you!
--
Maks Wilde, P.Eng
Senior Control Systems Engineer
Cell: 519.536.6310
mwilde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.kicsystems.ca
--
Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only
for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying,
circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message and any attachments
from your system.
_________________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Schneider Electric
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own
risks. See the disclaimer at www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
