[faxcenter] Re: New Release (1.4 build 11)
- From: Ben Mackin <bmackin@xxxxxxx>
- To: <faxcenter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 11:48:14 -0700
On 7/9/04 5:54 AM, "Frank Coe" <fcoe@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Congratulations on your release of the new release and happy birthday. It
> is really good to finally have manual receive working.
>
> Maybe I am missing something, but the naming convention for received faxes
> doesn't appear to work as advertised. The fax I just received was stored as
> "2004-07-09_07.37.06.pdf". I don't see the phone number. Do I have to have
> Caller ID for this to work? Or does this come from the station ID as I have
> always assumed? In my case, the station ID is " SONY". Does
> a non-numeric result negate this option?
>
> I can live without the phone number, but I thought you should have this
> feedback. Is anyone else seeing this?
The number does indeed come from the stationID. It shouldn't matter that it
is non-numeric. What would be great is if someone else can do a few receive
tests, with a numeric stationID, and see if it is captured correctly.
Thanks,
Ben
http://www.shayufilms.com
Other related posts:
