RES: Exchange 2003 Cached Mode on the LAN
- From: "Tiago de Aviz" <Tiago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:56:59 -0300
They keep an archive of communications about training with each customer. So
when a customer makes an inquiry, they move that mail from their customer to
the PF, along with their answer for documentation purposes; All that along with
commercial purposes docs, supplier negotiations, etc. They keep very few things
on the mailbox.
I don't know, I've already tried to leave the wireless syncing the PF's and
after a long time outlook would corrupt the OST because it got too big. I don't
know if SharePoint would suffice, it wouldn't be as easy to use as the PF's.
They are very resistant to changes.
Also, from times to times, we clean up and maintain only two years of history.
All the rest goes to our archive.
Tiago de Aviz
SoftSell - Curitiba
(41) 340-2363
www.softsell.com.br
Esta mensagem, incluindo seus anexos, tem caráter confidencial e seu conteúdo é
restrito ao destinatário da mensagem. Caso você tenha recebido esta mensagem
por engano, queira por favor retorná-la ao destinatário e apagá-la de seus
arquivos. Qualquer uso não autorizado, replicação ou disseminação desta
mensagem ou parte dela é expressamente proibido. A SoftSell não é responsável
pelo conteúdo ou a veracidade desta informação.
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Rick Boza [mailto:rickb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2005 11:38
Para: [ExchangeList]
Assunto: [exchangelist] Re: RES: Re: RES: RE: RES: RE: Exchange 2003 Cached
Mode on the LAN
http://www.MSExchange.org/
Yeah, big folders can cause pain, although it would really be just the
initial sync, after that, unless huge changes take place on a daily basis,
the sync traffic would be relatively small.
Now, then, onto my soapbox - if you have PFs with 3 GIGs PLUS of data in
each, maybe a public folder isn't the right mechanism for that storage? A
SharePoint repository would probably be a better solution, or an FTP site if
those are just really big files.
On 3/2/05 9:36 AM, "Tiago de Aviz" <Tiago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> http://www.MSExchange.org/
>
> No, just trying to make it less serious than it appears. If you start talking
> too serious here some people may think that you're rude or something ;)
>
> I can't, the folders are too big. Some department's public folder reach 3gb.
> If I synch these fellas, thru 11mbps wireless connections, ack!!!
>
> All that because the ladies from management didn't want any cables attached to
> their laptops (except for the power cords) and didn't want to break walls and
> put conduits, cables, etc.
>
> Tiago de Aviz
>
> SoftSell - Curitiba
>
> (41) 340-2363
>
> www.softsell.com.br
>
> Esta mensagem, incluindo seus anexos, tem caráter confidencial e seu conteúdo
> é restrito ao destinatário da mensagem. Caso você tenha recebido esta mensagem
> por engano, queira por favor retorná-la ao destinatário e apagá-la de seus
> arquivos. Qualquer uso não autorizado, replicação ou disseminação desta
> mensagem ou parte dela é expressamente proibido. A SoftSell não é responsável
> pelo conteúdo ou a veracidade desta informação.
>
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Rick Boza [mailto:rickb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2005 11:15
> Para: [ExchangeList]
> Assunto: [exchangelist] Re: RES: RE: RES: RE: Exchange 2003 Cached Mode on the
> LAN
>
> http://www.MSExchange.org/
>
> Tiago could instruct his users to enable the important Public Folders as
> favorites, which could then be configured to be cached as well. In a
> similar event, Tiago's users could still get to their data.
>
> Does Tiago always refer to himself in the third person (sorry, had to ask)?
>
>
> On 3/2/05 9:12 AM, "Tiago de Aviz" <Tiago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> http://www.MSExchange.org/
>>
>> Tiago's got ARCserve 9 and IBM servers ;)
>>
>> Tiago also tests his backups.
>>
>> Backup good.
>>
>> Here our folks use more public folders than their own mailboxes. Cached mode
>> wouldn't save me in the case of a disaster. That's what happened march last
>> year... Our exchange box overheated and all disks fried. Folks with cached
>> mode could still see their e-mail, but they wanted public folders back, too.
>>
>> Tiago de Aviz
>>
>> SoftSell - Curitiba
>>
>> (41) 340-2363
>>
>> www.softsell.com.br
>>
>> Esta mensagem, incluindo seus anexos, tem caráter confidencial e seu conteúdo
>> é restrito ao destinatário da mensagem. Caso você tenha recebido esta
>> mensagem
>> por engano, queira por favor retorná-la ao destinatário e apagá-la de seus
>> arquivos. Qualquer uso não autorizado, replicação ou disseminação desta
>> mensagem ou parte dela é expressamente proibido. A SoftSell não é responsável
>> pelo conteúdo ou a veracidade desta informação.
>>
>>
>> -----Mensagem original-----
>> De: Bruce J. Rose [mailto:brose@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2005 10:50
>> Para: [ExchangeList]
>> Assunto: [exchangelist] RE: RES: RE: Exchange 2003 Cached Mode on the LAN
>>
>> http://www.MSExchange.org/
>>
>> Also if you loose Exchange server and nogood backups Cache can be archived
>> and
>> recover the email after exchange is built.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Steve Moffat [mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 8:16 AM
>> To: [ExchangeList]
>> Subject: [exchangelist] RE: RES: RE: Exchange 2003 Cached Mode on the LAN
>>
>> http://www.MSExchange.org/
>>
>> Mmmm....I find the opposite, users with large mailboxes get far better
>> performance in cached mode.
>>
>> S
>>
Other related posts:
- » RES: Exchange 2003 Cached Mode on the LAN
