http://www.msexchange.org -------------------------------------------------------Like antivirus, having multiple vendor products can be a good thing to help fight spam, however, you need to consider your end users and how it effect sthem. For A/V, the end user doesn't interact with it, but for spam, most products allow end user interaction, and layering on multiple products means more management for the end user. That could mean very unhappy users. -----Original Message----- From: exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:exchangelist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Howard Rappaport Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 6:33 PM To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ExchangeList] Re: is multiple anti apam a good idea? doing? You could use connection filtering, rbls, sender filtering but then you've just added more layers of complexity that you might not need if you configured GFI a little differently. But I don't know if you're even unsatisfied with your current solution. Simpler works better for me. -----Original Message----- From: "Ara Avvali" <Ara.Avvali@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:28:07 To:undisclosed-recipients: ; Subject: [ExchangeList] is multiple anti apam a good idea? Hello Something I am not sure about. I have GFI mail essentials set but do you think having sender and intelligent message filtering enabled as well is good to? Thanks ------------------------------------------------------- List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/exchangelist/ MSExchange Newsletter: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp MSExchange Articles and Tutorials: http://www.msexchange.org/articles_tutorials/ MSExchange Blogs: http://blogs.msexchange.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites: http://www.techgenix.com ------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe visit http://www.msexchange.org/pages/exchangelist.asp Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx