[etni] to David Herz, Re: Bagrut: Sharon Tzur's post on modeling our Bagrut on the math modules
- From: judy <judyewc@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: etni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:33:38 +0300
The problem is that the Bagrut is a huge industry. Every year more than 500
different kinds of Bagrut questionnaires are drawn up, designed, printed,
distributed, mailed, proctored, and checked. Not to mention all the
overtime put in at schools, the private schools and courses, the Bagrut
practice books, the fees for the tests
themsleves.....................................
In the late 1990's a group of educators got together to discuss Bagrut
alternatives, including a relatively successful project in 22 schools where
in certain subjects kids did papers and projects instead of tests. In the
ensuing discussion it was mentioned again and again - and more or less
became the main conclusion - that the Bagrut is "a powerful tool" for the
education system (whatever that means).
It is certainly a source of employment for many people and a vehicle of
discipline and motivation for many teachers. I have yet to see a teachers'
strike or protest that complains about the Bagrut - after all, we get more
money for Bagrut preparation.
At least, in former years, you could actually teach English, and then, about
halfway through 12th grade, start Bagrut preparation. Now it is all about
Bagrut. I know some teachers still teach English for the sake of learning
English - particularly with really good classes or Native Speakers. But in
a comprehensive high school, where principals are trying to establish a
better Bagrut track record, and to pinch, push, pull and hoist less-able
students into the desired status of zakkai le'Bagrut - don't expect to see
much interest in change.
Judy Cohen
--
"Music will save the world." Pablo Casals
Other related posts:
