No. Austria asked the question which was ignored by Russia.
On 15 Nov 2017, at 11:44, T. B. <scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just to be sure, you rolled for reinforcements since Bagration was adj. right?
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Makis Xiroyannis <makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 15 November 2017 11:30:34
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Tula Battle Report
thank you!
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Laertes Papaspyrou
<bitoulis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Austria/Prussia vs Russia
Allied Forces
Commander Charles
Austria I Corps and Grenadier I , II
Prussia V corps
10 Guard/ 8 Cavalry/ 26 infantry/ 2 militia
46 factors, Morale 3.6
Russia
Commander Kutusov
III Corps
12 infantry / 1 cavalry
13 factors, Morale 3,1
Tactics : Echelon vs Defend
Modifiers : +1 die modification due to strategic rating
Round 1 results
Austria 3-->4 table 1-3 5% of 46 = 2 casualties and -1.3 mrl
Russia 4-->5 table 4-1 15% of 13 = 2 casualties and -1.4 mrl
Round 2 results
Austria 3-->4 table 2-3 10% of 44 = 4 casualties and -1.5 mrl (Cumulative
-2.8)
Russia 3-->4 table 3-1 10% of 11 = 1 casualty and -0.8 mrl (cumulative -2.2)
Round 3 results
Austria 6-->7 table 2-4 15% of 43 = 6 casualties and -3,8 mrl (Cumulative
-6,6 BREAK)
Russia 6-->7 table 2-1 10% of 7 = 1 casualty and -1,4 mrl (cumulative -3,6
BREAK)
Aftermath
BOTH BREAK: No PPs exchanged
CASUALTIES : 4 for allies (3 Austria, 1 Prussia) / 12 for Russia. One must be
a cavalry unit on both sides
COMMANDERS : Rolled successfully
