[dungeoncrawl] Shawn, skip the other emails - read this one!

  • From: jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:52:02 US/Eastern

Sorry, Shawn - John and I already 
patched up.  Ancient history.  And why 
are you at work?  

> 
>     Glad to know you returned none 
the worse for wear.  Aren't you supposed
> to be off today?  I hope those 100 e-
mails are personal and not business
> related.  :)
> 
> widderslainte wrote:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: dungeoncrawl-
bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:dungeoncrawl-
bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > > Johnathan Detrick
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 
8:42 AM
> > > To: Jim and Karen; Riders II
> > > Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Re: Tsk, 
tsk! :)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > >     I don't want to sound harsh, 
so I did send this out to
> > > the group.  Damon, Matt, Shawn, 
Bobby, Keith?  Bueller?  What
> > > do you think?  Was I wrong in not 
alerting the DM to this
> > > rule?  I'd love to hear some 
other opinions.
> >
> > Wrong, no.  I've always considering 
it courtious of players to notify
> > the DM of spell duration and other 
details.  They've got enough to keep
> > track of, much less knowing about 
all the spells out there.  But I'd
> > also say, yes, Talos probably 
wouldn't know what's going on, unless 
it's
> > a spell he can cast, or has been 
around quite a bit.  Spellcraft test
> > (with some penalty) would be the 
way I'd go.
> >
> > More later (in general).  100 
emails left to read.
> 
> 
> 



Other related posts:

  • » [dungeoncrawl] Shawn, skip the other emails - read this one!