Sorry, Shawn - John and I already patched up. Ancient history. And why are you at work? > > Glad to know you returned none the worse for wear. Aren't you supposed > to be off today? I hope those 100 e- mails are personal and not business > related. :) > > widderslainte wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: dungeoncrawl- bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:dungeoncrawl- bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > > > Johnathan Detrick > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:42 AM > > > To: Jim and Karen; Riders II > > > Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Re: Tsk, tsk! :) > > > > > > > > > > > I don't want to sound harsh, so I did send this out to > > > the group. Damon, Matt, Shawn, Bobby, Keith? Bueller? What > > > do you think? Was I wrong in not alerting the DM to this > > > rule? I'd love to hear some other opinions. > > > > Wrong, no. I've always considering it courtious of players to notify > > the DM of spell duration and other details. They've got enough to keep > > track of, much less knowing about all the spells out there. But I'd > > also say, yes, Talos probably wouldn't know what's going on, unless it's > > a spell he can cast, or has been around quite a bit. Spellcraft test > > (with some penalty) would be the way I'd go. > > > > More later (in general). 100 emails left to read. > > >