On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:07:51 +0000 Chris Smith <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If your sql implementation had a separate group and group membership > tables, then group membership modification is a much simpler process > that user modification - there should be no need to modify the user > table only the group membership table. You are right. I was a bit confused by the fact that nobody seems to use this code yet. Therefore it might be tricky to test it properly. ;-) Nevertheless I will complete my implementation. Best Regards Matthias -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist