Robert Greenfield wrote: > On 19 Feb, Stefan Bellon <sbellon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > A more technically interesting point is, that this UnRAR module > > must have to be built with GCC and not with Norcroft, as the UnRAR > > code for version 3 rarchives is written in C++. > Oh! Can Norcroft still not really do C++ very well? There hasn't been any C++ development on top of that Cfront thing. > > I think there are quite a few > > obstacles in the way. > Could SparkFS be used as a front end for the existing unRAR module? Which "existing unRAR module" are you referring to? -- Stefan Bellon