On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 04:04:22PM +0200, taxakis wrote: > Even 125 billion/month is misleading. > Wonder if there's someone on the list who can set this out/extrapolate to > the magnitude of data transported. > Supposedly NSA Nevada could hold 5 Zettabytes. They don't have nearly enough power for that, unless the spindles are only spun up on demand (feasible by structuring records over time). A rack is about a PByte, so 10^3 racks an Exabyte. I doubt they have more than 10^4. Assuming 10 kW/rack, and 10^4 racks, that's 100 MW -- the whole Utah facility has only 65 MW. 10^3 racks at 10 MW total appears more realistic. Very large scale HDD purchases should also be traceable by going to manufacturers. > {http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/04/12/nsa-data-center-front-and-center-in- > debate-over-liberty-security-and-privacy/}