metadata n. a set of data that describes and gives information about other data. [1969 *Proc. IFIP Congr. 1968* I. 113/2 There are categories of information about each data set as a unit in a data set of data sets, which must be handled as a special meta data set. 1970 *Coshocton (Ohio) Tribune* 26 June 6/2 The FBI said [he] illegally gained information from the computer system of Metadata Computing Inc. of Louisville, Ky.] 1977 *ACM SIGMOD Rec.* Dec. 10/1 A simple inquiry of the data dictionary can show what metadata (that is, data about data and functions) remains to be collected. 1987 *Philos. Trans.* (Royal Soc.) A. *322* 373 The challenge is to accumulate data..from diverse sources, convert it to machine-readable form with a harmonized array of metadata descriptors and present the resulting database(s) to the user. 1998 *New Scientist* 30 May 35/2 With XML, attaching metadata to a document is easy, at least in theory. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Gary Wallin <garylwallin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I was pleased to see that DARPA was investigating Trans Cranial > Stimulation. A couple of years ago I checked with my shrink to see if it > was available here in Iowa. Found out it's been tried a little but seems to > have fallen by the wayside. Probably not as effective or as profitable as > the pharmaceutical company's' products. > > Looks to me like the ActivistPost site is a tin foil hat operation that > pushes paranoia as a means of gaining power and influence over the eyeballs > that land on the site. I was disappointed to see ads pop up for > pseudo-scientific FREE ENERGY machines. It's not just the National Security > State that induces fear to gain power and advantage. There's a large number > of private sector 'Information' pages that do the same thing. > > By the way, has anybody checked the Oxford English Dictionary and > Historical Thesaurus for information about the word 'Metadata'? I'm curious > about when and how it was first used in the modern context. As a member of > the bankrupt Lumpen Proletariat I can't afford the Oxford Dictionary's > paywall. > > > > > > On 7/29/2013 1:10 PM, In Harms Way wrote: > > > With all due respect, Gary, but if you can not refute this > http://www.activistpost.com/2013/07/secret-darpa-mind-control-project.html- > you will have to realize that the wonderful new world you so easily want > to get adapted to will not stop at surveillance. Unless you change and > fight for your humanity - of which real privacy is a fundamental right - I > am afraid that your vegetative state is near. > > Gary Wallin wrote, On 29/07/2013 20:28: > > For a quick look at how metadata can be abused, look here: > http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=579_1375101344 > > The more you try to protect yourself, the more you will come under > surveillance and the less privacy you will have. The Panopticon is an > evolutionary (or perhaps evilutionary) change in our social behavior. The > simple expectations of privacy that we grew up with in the 1950's no longer > apply. We will be assimilated and will have to adapt. It is our Humanity > that we have to protect, not our privacy. > > > > > > > > On 7/29/2013 8:59 AM, In Harms Way wrote: > > Gary, you maybe want to change your name to Gary Borg Wallin. > > We have nothing to hide - but we have something to PROTECT! > > Let's pull the plug on them. > > IHW > > Gary Wallin wrote, On 29/07/2013 15:49: > > On 7/29/2013 6:28 AM, John Young wrote: > > > http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/07/surveillance-free-day-part-i.html > > > > > An entertaining take on the preposterous idea of going surveillance-free. > > I like the salient commentary: "Both Jon and Gary pointed out one of the > central paradoxes of my day – that, by downloading Tor and HideMyAss, by > paying for software in Bitcoin, wrapping my phones in foil, and by turning > my head into a giant glowing orb, I’m effectively asking to be put on a > terrorist watch list. It’s the digital equivalent of hanging a big “I’M > SKETCHY” sign around my neck." > > As we learned from the Borg in Star Trek - Resistance is Futile! > > Surveillance is part of our nature now and we must learn to live with it. > Better that it be used to freshen the air and inform the public than become > a tool of those that would oppress. > > -- > All my email is subject to viewing by the Panopticon :: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon :: > Except in the imaginations of the netizens there is no real secrecy or > privacy on the Internets. The powers that be have been elevated to lofty > positions of near omnipresence. Enjoy, adapt, and survive. > > > > > -- > All my email is subject to viewing by the Panopticon :: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon :: > Except in the imaginations of the netizens there is no real secrecy or > privacy on the Internets. The powers that be have been elevated to lofty > positions of near omnipresence. Enjoy, adapt, and survive. > > > > > -- > All my email is subject to viewing by the Panopticon :: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panopticon :: > Except in the imaginations of the netizens there is no real secrecy or > privacy on the Internets. The powers that be have been elevated to lofty > positions of near omnipresence. Enjoy, adapt, and survive. > >