[cryptome] Re: Fwd: Re: Re: Hitler and Zionism: Haavara Agreement 1933
- From: Peter Presland <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:15:00 +0100
On 17/06/2016 13:29, Samuel Birbeck wrote:
On Jun 17, 2016 9:47 PM, "Peter Presland" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Because it's Nazi bullshit,
So tell me, why should public discussion of bullshit be illegal? or is
it only 'Nazi' bullshit? and if so why?
and history - actual, verifiable history,
Really? - So:
1. show me the NSDP originating extermination order
2. deal with the vast, evidence-based discrepancies in the numbers, and
3. deal with the utterly impossible logistics in gassings at the rate
and volumes the official narrative requires.
not the alternate universe stuff you peddle - has shown us what can
happen when Nazis are allowed to peddle their bullshit.
I've stayed quiet while you assert your baseless "facts",
They are not baseless; they are well-founded on verifiable evidence.
They constitute a threat to the official narrative and are thus treated
with the sort of courtesy evidenced in your replies. They put 'survivor
witnesses testimony into perspective and accords it the the
circumspection that good legal practice requires.
get upset when others politely disagree,
Firstly it is not I who is getting upset and secondly, other than from
Doug Rankine, there has been nothing polite about my treatment on this
thread.
and recommend white supremacist blogs which
also do nothing but assert "facts" and rant about how every modern
atrocity is the fault of Jews.
I did not recommend them; I cited them as examples of near
polar-opposites to the official narrative, with an invitation to discuss
any solid evidence they may contain. That does not constitute an
endorsement.
Now I am happy to pipe up again just to reiterate my initial dismissal
of your garbage opinions on what constitutes history. Nazism is not to
be debated. It is to be smashed. Go fuck yourself.
No. It's not Nazism that is 'not to be debated' as you so eloquently put
it; it is the potentially vast distortions of history that Specifically
Jewish power has had on events over the past 150 years or so. That is
what must not be discussed and it is the Holocaust Industry whose vastly
lucrative business it is to enforce the taboo.
PeterP
Other related posts:
