[cryptome] Re: Complete Stingray Manual Released by FCC

  • From: Andrew Hornback <achornback@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:04:54 -0400

It's probably a safe assumption that the device that's fully redacted from
that document is an AmberJack.


I'm wondering how the features really compare to something like...



--- A

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Douglas Rankine <
douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> See url: http://cryptome.org/2015/03/fcc-stingray-final.pdf
> I must say that this is one of the best, most easiest to understand and
> shortest technical manuals I have ever read.  The US government, the FCC
>  and the courts, must be congratulated  for its publishing of it under the
> Freedom of Information Act, and must be promoted as a first grade candidate
> for the “Plain English” campaign.  Oh...If only all working manuals were as
> good as this...we would solve the problems of the world in an instant.
> For fuller and more explicit declassified version on what it is and how it
> works...
> see url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stingray_phone_tracker
> Enjoy... J.
> Dougie.

Other related posts: