It's probably a safe assumption that the device that's fully redacted from that document is an AmberJack. https://publicintelligence.net/harris-corporation-amberjack-stingray-stingray-ii-kingfish-wireless-surveillance-products-price-list/ I'm wondering how the features really compare to something like... http://www.phonearena.com/news/DIY-enthusiasts-make-their-own-cell-phone-tower-using-a-Raspberry-Pi_id37976 or http://www.shoghicom.com/cellular-monitoring.php --- A On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Douglas Rankine < douglasrankine2001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > See url: http://cryptome.org/2015/03/fcc-stingray-final.pdf > > > > I must say that this is one of the best, most easiest to understand and > shortest technical manuals I have ever read. The US government, the FCC > and the courts, must be congratulated for its publishing of it under the > Freedom of Information Act, and must be promoted as a first grade candidate > for the “Plain English” campaign. Oh...If only all working manuals were as > good as this...we would solve the problems of the world in an instant. > > For fuller and more explicit declassified version on what it is and how it > works... > > see url: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stingray_phone_tracker > > Enjoy... J. > > Dougie. >
