Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:43:54 +0200
WTF.
When I told you to play VS you said the game was "too abstract" and that
only the Japanese could play it so there was no point in even trying.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:38 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> salie plays bb hood like a lame drunk.
>
> sf memory lane battles are getting old man, its not like ive stopped
> playing these games I just don't play it as regular as I used to.
>
> let me body u in ds3
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:34:39 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Nope.
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:31 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> ft5 tonight
>
> I win we play ds3
>
> u win we play dong dong
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:30:12 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can't play Darkstalkers 3. And no.
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> darkstalkers 3 invitional les go!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:27:08 +0200
>
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Yeah, and then I blocked your spam and you were free for the rest of the
> matches. If you didn't mash after getting knocked down every single time,
> you might have won. Maybe. Actually, no.
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:24 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> tsek sap, get bopped with my young toguru 100% redizzy combos
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:21:10 +0200
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> toguru
>
> It's not a major loss. You'll enjoy the hell out of 2. One of the best
> RPGs ever made.
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I didn’t play Witcher 1 though. Apparently the story is supposed to
> continue from some choices in the first one.
> Don’t have the time to be playing the old one as well though.
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 21 October 2014 12:14 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>
> Witcher 2 is a good test. That game is one hell of a resource hog.
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> My new graphics card arrived this morning. Need to plug that puppy in
> and see how Witcher 2 runs. Probably better off with something like Shadow
> of Mordor where I will be able to see just how sweet the thing is.
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> *Sent:* 21 October 2014 10:12 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>
> Man. That PS2 hackery.
>
> Some games look so good in widescreen.
> Devil May Cry 1 feels so much less claustrophobic.
> We seriously have to do a DefJam FFNY battle at some stage as well. The
> game looks good for its years.
> Now I have to remember wtf did I do to get NeoGeo Battle Colisseum to
> run? I remember being surprised as hell when Manase told me his "just
> worked"
> Street Fighter Alpha Anthology, and Darkstalkers collection run on opl
> version 5 revision 5.
> I gotta try and find that.
> On 21 Oct 2014 07:58, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Morning peeps,
>
> Blanka is really strong in sf, he should place higher in tournaments
>
> ------------------------------
> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:40:20 +0200
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> TJ Combo too stronk
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNFhOwzNzCY
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> dafuq? Nemo saying Ryu is bottom tier.
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Some really awesome matches here. That Ken setup into combo is ridiculous.
>
> @LB, what time should we start?
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Checkout the CE Blanka vortex @ 13m33s:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR4jV58lbvo
> Also check out the nice Ken setup into combo he does @ 20m41s.
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> BTW, CE is still alive and well in Brazil. They had an international
> tournament earlier this year:
> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAnXZIS9_a8mQJ85rMgEh0Q
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> @Manase:
> This guy has some nice "classic" CE Boxer (ie. the weaker version)
> matches on his channel:
> https://www.youtube.com/user/sf2ce/search?query=Balrog
> Seems like vs Shotos you have to stand in the range where HP trades with
> fireballs. There is also a range where if Boxer blocks a fireball he can
> do dash straight and it will punish the next fireball. He also has a
> blockstring that leaves him just out for cr.mk range for a whiff-punish.
> (sound is quite loud)
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQZKQsj_9g4
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
