RE: USF4 changes!
- From: Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:04:11 +0000
Why?
Its not as good as DS1 but its still pretty damn good.
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:04:54 +0200
Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
TBH I don't have any desire to play DS2.
On 19 August 2014 11:04, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"look like great games"
On 19 August 2014 09:35, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Shadow of Morodor and lords of the fallen look like great games.
ima trade in that kuk DS.
> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:26:58 +0200
> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I'd rather buy tik.
>
> On 19/08/2014, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Morning peeps
> >
> > toys r us having a preorder on xbone.
> >
> > R6000 for standalone 500 gig and 1 controller with 2 download tokens for
> > fifa and forza.
> >
> > The BT deal seems the best so far overall.
> >
> > Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:06:09 +0200
> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Yeah, Raiden's throw now looks more like I would've imagined it.
> >
> > Like the change so far.
> > On 18 Aug 2014 14:16, "Di Lhong" <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYyLadj5g0g
> >
> > We should watch all the movies they listed during session XD
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm more interested in the new characters :) like to see how their design
> > would fit into the universe. so far d'vorah, kotal kahn, ferra torr, cassie
> > cage looks good :) they're still tweaking animation and models so cassie's
> > neck won't be a giraffe and her up kick doesn't look so wooden.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
> > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well his 50/50 was low/overhead and both were launch on block. That would’ve
> > been okay if he could at least build bar a little faster.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I don’t think the character was crap, he just needed a small tweak. Scorpion
> > felt like an amazing rushdown character, but playing
> > him like that would get you killed.
> >
> > Subby sat on the opposite side to Scorp – builds bar but never needs to use
> > it. Better normal. Safer overhead (which leads to combos
> > as well).
> >
> > Anyhoo… Raiden looks damned cool.
> >
> >
> > From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> >
> > Sent: 18 August 2014 1:12 PM
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> >
> >
> > I thought scorp was fair, he just needed a better way to start a combo from
> > a low.
> >
> > But this balance discussion will go on forever.
> >
> > Things I would change.... the list would be too long.
> >
> > I think Brutality is going to make a comeback.
> >
> >
> > On 18 Aug 2014 13:05, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Actually Scorp’s combo damage wasn’t his major problem. He could deal 40%
> > off a jump on combo and
> > around 30% for most other staples. The problem is that you needed bar with
> > him for safety since his risk was high, reward was low. You had to play
> > really carefully and safely, only to have your combo broken in the first
> > hit. Theyn you were screwed. He built
> > bar too slowly, couldn’t pressure properly (other than having a 50/50) and
> > had a below average ranged game.
> >
> > All in all, he was mid-tier, maybe towards the bottom of that group. Subby
> > was better.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Di Lhong
> >
> > Sent: 18 August 2014 12:42 PM
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >
> >
> > I'm sure the current build and final product will be pretty different too.
> > They've completely changed Raiden's X-Ray. He now launches the opponent into
> > the air and does some electrifying
> > combo instead of the X-Ray we saw during his character trailer.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Whatever they change. I hope it's for the balance of the game and not
> > because some gaming fans or Tom Brady decides he doesn't like it...Didn't
> > Scorpion did ridiculous damage during
> > beta in mk9 too? Will history repeat itself? :/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So far the game looks like it's going to be a hit. They're pooling in what's
> > good in mk9 and injustice.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Can't wait to see more of MKX and T7.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Xrd looks good too but i'll have to start from 0 with that game...read that
> > Ino is not so great in that game :/ Faust seems to be a hit in Japan.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
> > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I just hope they don’t nerf Scorpion into ground again. Or it’s more that I
> > hope they balance the
> > game properly. I have no idea how they’re going to get that right with the
> > sheer number of variations the game will have going. I’m guessing we’ll be
> > seeing large numbers of updates for the first year.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I’m having trouble caring about current games. I want MKX and Tekken 7 now.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From:
> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Di Lhong
> >
> > Sent: 18 August 2014 11:24 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > @nic - MKX is looking good :) each characters have different jump in attack
> > animation. So it's not as generic as mk9. At the current build Scorpion does
> > the biggest damage in combos.
> > I just hope the game doesnt revolve around Variation A (rush down) beats
> > Variation B (zoning) easily.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I saw Oscar Broly's Sheeva beat Smoke and Kabal...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Someone say Troll 2?
> >
> > Best worst acting ever.
> >
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyophYBP_w4
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Smoke?
> >
> > I am surprised. Underrated character.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
> > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Watched a cute film over the weekend – The Best Worst Movie
> > -http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1144539/.
> > It’s about Troll 2
> >
> > From:
> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> >
> > Sent: 18 August 2014 8:58 AM
> >
> >
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
> >
> >
> > Character usage?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 18 Aug 2014 08:57, "Moshe Shevel" <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Glad to hear he got in touch :)
> >
> > I hope he actually pitches up and keeps on coming for more :)
> >
> >
> > On 18 Aug 2014 8:54 AM, "Donaldson, Alasdair"
> > <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hopefully he doesn’t play Kabal or Cyrax…
> >
> > From:
> > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > On Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> >
> > Sent: 18 August 2014 7:50 AM
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >
> > I like him already.
> >
> >
> > On 18 Aug 2014 00:25, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > *LOL*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all, I trust everyone is well :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Someone new wil be joining the sessions, courtesy of Jag. His name is
> > Tamkeen Sataar aka EnChY and he plays KOF and MK.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > See ya'll soon :)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 8:54 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Good session peeps.
> >
> >
> >
> > I would just like to say , if the current trend continues in GG, i might be
> > the most ownage in xrd ever. Didnt know i was so good in a game i dont even
> > play. Even marvel. Damn , 2 thirds of justin's team and I was taking games ,
> > kicking ass and taking names.
> > I need to not play games more often.
> >
> >
> >
> > Never losing a game. NEver gna make you vry. NEver gna say Goodbye , NEVer
> > gna Tell a lie.
> >
> >
> >
> > GREATNESS.
> >
> >
> >
> > Salie please go back and learn some baiken combos :/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 12:42:24 +0200
> >
> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >
> > From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > G-RAY is the session,, he said he is there
> >
> >
> > On Aug 16, 2014 12:38 PM, "Sameegh Jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Session today?
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > =========================================================================
> >
> > You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
> >
> >
> >
> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you
> > have received this communication in error, please address with the subject
> > heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the
> > e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient,
> > any disclosure, copying, distribution
> > or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
> > and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> > subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions
> > and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate
> > to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
> > itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you
> > have received this communication in error, please address with the subject
> > heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the
> > e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient,
> > any disclosure, copying, distribution
> > or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
> > and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> > subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions
> > and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate
> > to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
> > itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you
> > have received this communication in error, please address with the subject
> > heading "Received in error," send to the original sender, then delete the
> > e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient,
> > any disclosure, copying, distribution
> > or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
> > and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
> > subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions
> > and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate
> > to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
> > itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> > error, please address
> > with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original sender,
> > then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
> > taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
> > on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained
> > in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> > governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> > information in this e-mail and any attachments
> > that do not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given
> > nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity
> > for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
> > International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
> > International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
> > itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If
> > you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> > any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and
> > may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject
> > to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
> > engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
> > e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of
> > the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >
> >
> >
> > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services
> > to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
> > separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
> > structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
> > from your KPMG representative.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> > AntiVirus software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
> Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
Other related posts:
