Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 16:06:25 +0200
*fff+3* or running 3. Lol
On 25 Jul 2014 16:02, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I remember a match between myself and SAP on TTT2 where his Raven blocked
> my Ffrith Bruce while back turned!
> Namco needs to balance the game with the hitbox in mind too since it can
> defy the laws of the game.
> On 25 Jul 2014 15:55, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> There is lots of BS in the Tekken games - Aking or Julia's sweeps going
>> under hopkicks... Bob's uppercut going under demo man...Paul's shoulder
>> going through moves...
>> I love the tekken games, but there is random crap.
>> *From*: Di Lhong [mailto:numotd@xxxxxxxxx]
>> *Sent*: Friday, July 25, 2014 03:43 PM South Africa Standard Time
>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes!
>>
>> The ones that people have issues to punish is the super strict -10
>> frames moves with weird block recovery/stun...eg. Nina's uf+3...you used to
>> be able to jab her once she lands on her feet...now you have to punisher
>> her mid air but with the weird block recovery or frame lag...she's
>> considered grounded already...Steve's b+2, Hworang's uf+3+4, etc. all the
>> same...Jack's df+2 is not part of the brokeness of the game...it's been the
>> same since BR...luckily he got nerfed badly in TTT2 and most people learn
>> how to fight against him that he's not a threat like before...
>>
>> Stuff that suddenly goes thru or weird crush system is the same as BR.
>> Zaf's b+1+2 going thru or under low mids is common in BR. It's not a new
>> broken thing that comes in TTT2...or Feng's qcf+1.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> That Blanka representation...
>>> One game is not enough.
>>> On 25 Jul 2014 15:32, "Sean Carrington" <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Got this from BoyX2121 this morning.
>>>> Anyone interested here?
>>>> On 25 Jul 2014 15:01, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It will depend greatly on the range it used and the other characters
>>>>> punishment options.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are plenty of legit reasons why it could go unpunished if used
>>>>> at the correct range.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:57:28 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>> Yup, -14. Even with that people aren't punishing. Sad.
>>>>> *From*: Wynand-Ben [mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>>> *Sent*: Friday, July 25, 2014 02:51 PM South Africa Standard Time
>>>>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> *Subject*: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacks df+2 is bloody -14
>>>>>
>>>>> Depending on the character(mostly range issues) its not hard to punish.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cant blame the game if they are asleep.
>>>>>
>>>>> They only reason I can see them being hesitant to punish is due to
>>>>> range.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:34:13 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>> Strict? Just crappy. Did you watch the Evo finals? If JDCR can't
>>>>> punish properly, how are the rest of us expected to?
>>>>> Watch the top8 and take a shot everytime you see a Jack df+2 go
>>>>> unpunished. You'll be under the table in no time at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From*: Di Lhong [mailto:numotd@xxxxxxxxx]
>>>>> *Sent*: Friday, July 25, 2014 02:19 PM South Africa Standard Time
>>>>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah the punishment is much more strict than it was...due to the
>>>>> weird recovery frame.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Shit that is punishable one minute and not the next, wonky axis
>>>>> issues, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What bug? the basics is still the same :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> TTT2 is buggy as all hell. DR and BR were good. Tag2 is not.
>>>>> *From*: Di Lhong [mailto:numotd@xxxxxxxxx]
>>>>> *Sent*: Friday, July 25, 2014 01:46 PM South Africa Standard Time
>>>>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>
>>>>> TTT2 IS good :) but solo would be cool too. so we can go back to
>>>>> our mains...
>>>>>
>>>>> now i just have to find my true main...hmmm maybe it's time for Lee.
>>>>>
>>>>> Poor Harada, being swarmed with the same questions by fans lolz.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> FU
>>>>>
>>>>> TTT2 is good lol
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:27:07 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope it feels like an old Tekken game made for old people like me :/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 25 July 2014 13:20, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.gamenguide.com/articles/12175/20140723/tekken-7-release-date-unsure-pc-version-confirmed-jun-kazama.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>
>> ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>
Other related posts:
