Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 16:05:40 +0200
Every fighting game has its bs.
If it wasn't for fighting game bs, we wouldn't have had combos for as long
as we do. Lol.
I just hope to see some serious "flash" from the new Tekken game.
On 25 Jul 2014 15:55, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> There is lots of BS in the Tekken games - Aking or Julia's sweeps going
> under hopkicks... Bob's uppercut going under demo man...Paul's shoulder
> going through moves...
> I love the tekken games, but there is random crap.
> *From*: Di Lhong [mailto:numotd@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent*: Friday, July 25, 2014 03:43 PM South Africa Standard Time
> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes!
>
> The ones that people have issues to punish is the super strict -10
> frames moves with weird block recovery/stun...eg. Nina's uf+3...you used to
> be able to jab her once she lands on her feet...now you have to punisher
> her mid air but with the weird block recovery or frame lag...she's
> considered grounded already...Steve's b+2, Hworang's uf+3+4, etc. all the
> same...Jack's df+2 is not part of the brokeness of the game...it's been the
> same since BR...luckily he got nerfed badly in TTT2 and most people learn
> how to fight against him that he's not a threat like before...
>
> Stuff that suddenly goes thru or weird crush system is the same as BR.
> Zaf's b+1+2 going thru or under low mids is common in BR. It's not a new
> broken thing that comes in TTT2...or Feng's qcf+1.
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> That Blanka representation...
>> One game is not enough.
>> On 25 Jul 2014 15:32, "Sean Carrington" <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Got this from BoyX2121 this morning.
>>> Anyone interested here?
>>> On 25 Jul 2014 15:01, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It will depend greatly on the range it used and the other characters
>>>> punishment options.
>>>>
>>>> There are plenty of legit reasons why it could go unpunished if used at
>>>> the correct range.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:57:28 +0000
>>>>
>>>> Yup, -14. Even with that people aren't punishing. Sad.
>>>> *From*: Wynand-Ben [mailto:paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>> *Sent*: Friday, July 25, 2014 02:51 PM South Africa Standard Time
>>>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> *Subject*: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>
>>>> Jacks df+2 is bloody -14
>>>>
>>>> Depending on the character(mostly range issues) its not hard to punish.
>>>>
>>>> Cant blame the game if they are asleep.
>>>>
>>>> They only reason I can see them being hesitant to punish is due to
>>>> range.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:34:13 +0000
>>>>
>>>> Strict? Just crappy. Did you watch the Evo finals? If JDCR can't punish
>>>> properly, how are the rest of us expected to?
>>>> Watch the top8 and take a shot everytime you see a Jack df+2 go
>>>> unpunished. You'll be under the table in no time at all.
>>>>
>>>> *From*: Di Lhong [mailto:numotd@xxxxxxxxx]
>>>> *Sent*: Friday, July 25, 2014 02:19 PM South Africa Standard Time
>>>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>
>>>> Yeah the punishment is much more strict than it was...due to the
>>>> weird recovery frame.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Shit that is punishable one minute and not the next, wonky axis issues,
>>>> etc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> What bug? the basics is still the same :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> TTT2 is buggy as all hell. DR and BR were good. Tag2 is not.
>>>> *From*: Di Lhong [mailto:numotd@xxxxxxxxx]
>>>> *Sent*: Friday, July 25, 2014 01:46 PM South Africa Standard Time
>>>> *To*: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> *Subject*: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>
>>>> TTT2 IS good :) but solo would be cool too. so we can go back to our
>>>> mains...
>>>>
>>>> now i just have to find my true main...hmmm maybe it's time for Lee.
>>>>
>>>> Poor Harada, being swarmed with the same questions by fans lolz.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> FU
>>>>
>>>> TTT2 is good lol
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:27:07 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope it feels like an old Tekken game made for old people like me :/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 25 July 2014 13:20, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.gamenguide.com/articles/12175/20140723/tekken-7-release-date-unsure-pc-version-confirmed-jun-kazama.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
Other related posts:
