Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:13:26 +0200
Ok, so you built the meter back during the combo. Nice :)
The only character I can manage similar damage with is Avdol, and it's
situational.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> Vanilla Ice got +/- 650 damage for 4 bars (yes, that's right) and his
> stand for otg.
> Regular stand attacks get him 1 hit on direction change.
> When your opponent is on the floor, you get 2.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Seems a bit like overkill to me. No pun intended.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 19 June 2014 9:13 AM
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>
>>
>>
>> they don't want you to come audit them so they started a coup.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:06:33 +0000
>>
>> Cool. I’m really beginning to miss playing the fighting games. It’s been
>> way too long… I need an extended period back in SA.
>>
>>
>>
>> Man, I was supposed to be going to Kenya for a project. I was complaining
>> a bit about it because it would’ve meant me being there over the Evo
>> weekend. After what’s been happening there over the last week, I don’t
>> think I’ll be going there anymore though.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>> *Sent:* 19 June 2014 9:01 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't think either character has the upper hand. In a 5-5, whoever
>> messes up first loses. That's generally how these matches went.
>>
>>
>>
>> If a matchup is 6-4 or worse, it's usually very evident.
>>
>>
>>
>> Both characters are capable of massive burst damage up close. It really
>> comes down to who can land the first hit and maintain pressure from there.
>> I'd say it's a 5-5. Maybe I'm wrong and they made it look like a 5-5 when
>> it isn't, but it didn't look one-sided to me.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:41 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> rpg's are cool man.
>>
>> I believe in 2012 it was in favour or oni and now in ultra I think its in
>> favour of Dudley.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:31:26 +0200
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Looks even.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> That was an epic set.
>> Out if interest, what’s the match-up between Oni and Dud?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 19 June 2014 8:08 AM
>>
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> shadow of mordor looks too epic.
>>
>> new take on arpg's. nemesis system ftw.
>>
>>
>> Sanford vs mug - went in as enemies came out as frienemies
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:55:09 +0000
>>
>> Watch the whole thing please
>>
>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:31:12 +0000
>>
>> *To: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Subject: *RE: USF4 changes!
>>
>>
>>
>> i watched 10 seconds and i dont get it.
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:01:59 +0000
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-KQW-cSpoc ,,, there I corrected it,,
>> now start laughing guys hahahahaha
>>
>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:52:48 +0000
>>
>> *To: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Subject: *RE: USF4 changes!
>>
>>
>>
>> broken link is broken
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:47:12 +0000
>>
>> Anyone that wants to laugh may watch this,, I find it very funny,,
>> http://www.youtube.con/watch?v=p-KQW-cSpoc
>>
>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:13:19 +0200
>>
>> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd get it *lol*
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Gutlike!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://nerdburglars.net/341/Article/this-white-ffvii-branded-ps1-will-make-you-want-to-throw-away-your-money.html
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:43 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm,, maybe
>>
>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Date: *Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:20:54 +0200
>>
>> *To: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>>
>>
>>
>> Finish him?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Excellent.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Excercised
>>
>> On 18 Jun 2014 09:07, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Ok peeps, it's time to exercise your right to vote yet again :P
>>
>>
>>
>> Vote for your preferred scoring format:
>> http://www.screator.net/showform.php?f=1193850619
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yup, been experimenting with that.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> You get a really large juggle after the dd+L's 4th hit.
>> You can run in jump attack, or qcb+B with a follow up.
>>
>> On 18 Jun 2014 08:42, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Kewl :) I start the juggle earlier but it gets kinda tricky after that
>> and the damage isn't all that great.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Yeap.
>> Jumping H L, M, H, qcb L cancel, crL, L, M, H, qcb F, cancel, qcb M, crL,
>> M, H, dd L, and then some options I'm still gonna check out to see if I can
>> make enough meter for a super. Pretty close with 2 options.
>>
>> Does it involve the launch stuff? :P I'm trying to find something cool
>> but practical. It would also help if it was damaging *lol*
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Lol.
>> I'm going for variation.
>> Too much playing with Mature I suppose.
>> I'm going for something waaaay more complicated, lol.
>>
>> On 17 Jun 2014 21:52, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I assume that's the GHA version.
>>
>>
>>
>> The combo I'm doing is:
>>
>>
>>
>> j.H, cr.Lx2, s.M, s.H xx qcb+L~cancel(I end up behind the opponent, then
>> cancel)~repeat same combo~cancel, cr.Lx2, s.M, s.H xx d,d+L xx HHA. That
>> should net you 558.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> My first attempt with a 3 bar Ikuro gets me 551 damage.
>>
>> On 17 Jun 2014 21:43, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> *lol* 558 now :P I'll take it!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> *lol* Oh well, managed to squeeze some extra damage out of the combo
>> so it's all good. I had a cool juggle variant in mind but it's kinda iffy.
>> I'll stick to the grounded version for now. The juggle stuff looks really
>> cool though :P
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Erm, scratch that, Ikuro gets health.
>> Lol.
>>
>> On 17 Jun 2014 21:35, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> True.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> You'll get lots more when you hit rage mode.
>>
>>
>> On 17 Jun 2014 21:32, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Interesting :P
>> >
>> > Seems my 'decent' combo with Ikuro requires 3 bars, not 2 :( I get 524
>> though so it's worth it. Also looks cool.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>> ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>
>
Other related posts:
