RE: USF4 changes!
- From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:17:59 +0000
are you guys practicing for jhb dudes?
you guys are taking it too easy this is serious stuff.
they might beat us in marvel sf and bb. we need to win at least one of these to
goto a tie breaker mystery game. then the real skill will come out.
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:13:26 +0200
Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ok, so you built the meter back during the combo. Nice :)
The only character I can manage similar damage with is Avdol, and it's
situational.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Vanilla Ice got +/- 650 damage for 4 bars (yes, that's right) and his stand for
otg.
Regular stand attacks get him 1 hit on direction change.
When your opponent is on the floor, you get 2.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seems a bit like overkill to me. No pun intended.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 19 June 2014 9:13 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
they don't want you to come audit them so they started a coup.
From:
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 07:06:33 +0000
Cool. I’m really beginning to miss playing the fighting games. It’s been way
too long… I need an extended period back in SA.
Man, I was supposed to be going to Kenya for a project. I was complaining a bit
about it because it would’ve meant me being there over the Evo weekend. After
what’s been happening there over the last week, I don’t think I’ll be going
there anymore though.
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ryan Williams
Sent: 19 June 2014 9:01 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
I don't think either character has the upper hand. In a 5-5, whoever messes up
first loses. That's generally how these matches went.
If a matchup is 6-4 or worse, it's usually very evident.
Both characters are capable of massive burst damage up close. It really comes
down to who can land the first hit and maintain pressure from there. I'd say
it's a 5-5. Maybe I'm wrong and
they made it look like a 5-5 when it isn't, but it didn't look one-sided to me.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:41 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rpg's are cool man.
I believe in 2012 it was in favour or oni and now in ultra I think its in
favour of Dudley.
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 08:31:26 +0200
Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Looks even.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That was an epic set.
Out if interest, what’s the match-up between Oni and Dud?
From:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 19 June 2014 8:08 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
shadow of mordor looks too epic.
new take on arpg's. nemesis system ftw.
Sanford vs mug - went in as enemies came out as frienemies
Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:55:09 +0000
Watch the whole thing please
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
From:
lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:31:12 +0000
To:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
ReplyTo:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
RE: USF4 changes!
i watched 10 seconds and i dont get it.
Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:01:59 +0000
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-KQW-cSpoc ,,, there I corrected it,, now start
laughing guys hahahahaha
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
From:
lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:52:48 +0000
To:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
ReplyTo:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
RE: USF4 changes!
broken link is broken
Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:47:12 +0000
Anyone that wants to laugh may watch this,, I find it very funny,,
http://www.youtube.con/watch?v=p-KQW-cSpoc
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
From:
Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:13:19 +0200
To:
<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
ReplyTo:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
Re: USF4 changes!
I'd get it *lol*
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gutlike!
http://nerdburglars.net/341/Article/this-white-ffvii-branded-ps1-will-make-you-want-to-throw-away-your-money.html
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:43 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hmmm,, maybe
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
From:
sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:20:54 +0200
To:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
ReplyTo:
cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
Re: USF4 changes!
Finish him?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Excellent.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Excercised
On 18 Jun 2014 09:07, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ok peeps, it's time to exercise your right to vote yet again :P
Vote for your preferred scoring format:
http://www.screator.net/showform.php?f=1193850619
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yup, been experimenting with that.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You get a really large juggle after the dd+L's 4th hit.
You can run in jump attack, or qcb+B with a follow up.
On 18 Jun 2014 08:42, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kewl :) I start the juggle earlier but it gets kinda tricky after that and the
damage isn't all that great.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yeap.
Jumping H L, M, H, qcb L cancel, crL, L, M, H, qcb F, cancel, qcb M, crL, M, H,
dd L, and then some options I'm still gonna check out to see if I can make
enough meter for a super. Pretty close with 2 options.
Does it involve the launch stuff? :P I'm trying to find something cool but
practical. It would also help if it was damaging *lol*
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Lol.
I'm going for variation.
Too much playing with Mature I suppose.
I'm going for something waaaay more complicated, lol.
On 17 Jun 2014 21:52, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I assume that's the GHA version.
The combo I'm doing is:
j.H, cr.Lx2, s.M, s.H xx qcb+L~cancel(I end up behind the opponent, then
cancel)~repeat same combo~cancel, cr.Lx2, s.M, s.H xx d,d+L xx HHA. That should
net you 558.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
My first attempt with a 3 bar Ikuro gets me 551 damage.
On 17 Jun 2014 21:43, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*lol* 558 now :P I'll take it!
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*lol* Oh well, managed to squeeze some extra damage out of the combo so it's
all good. I had a cool juggle variant in mind but it's kinda iffy. I'll stick
to the grounded version for now.
The juggle stuff looks really cool though :P
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Erm, scratch that, Ikuro gets health.
Lol.
On 17 Jun 2014 21:35, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
True.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You'll get lots more when you hit rage mode.
On 17 Jun 2014 21:32, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Interesting :P
>
> Seems my 'decent' combo with Ikuro requires 3 bars, not 2 :( I get 524 though
> so it's worth it. Also looks cool.
>
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received
this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any
action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
Opinions, conclusions
and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity
for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received
this communication in error, please address with the subject heading "Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any
copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any
action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may
be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the
terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
Opinions, conclusions
and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity
for a network of independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG
International provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes
itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
Other related posts:
