[CPT-FGC] Re: Hi

  • From: Moshe Shevel <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:20:45 +0200

The FC guys are insane, 3 of them basically killed Hydra while the rest of
us just ran around trying to look like we knew how to play the game... now
to continue the relic quest we have to beat each of the HM Primals, that's
going to be fun
On 18 Nov 2013 11:16 AM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Nah man. Maybe after the patch, bt i doubt we wil be able to beat hm
> titan. That explanation video jst put me off the game completly
> ------------------------------
> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:04:21 +0000
>  You still playing FF, LB?
> Ran AK with a tank who bailed after we died against Demon Wall. Waited for
> a while and a new tank joined. Finished the dungeon with him.
> Also killed Chimera. Next up is hydra, and I supposed HM Garuda at some
> point.
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
> *Sent:* 18 November 2013 11:01 AM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> Meh, i dnt do science. Needs more bb
>  ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:50:13 +0200
> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> So this SSFIV OS is stupidly good:
> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2013/nov/17/proximity-blocking-option-selects-punish-whiffs-and-more-super-street-fighter-4-arcade-edition-v2012/
> James Chen said he received word that it's training mode only, but some
> people are saying they've done it in versus mode.
> Basically it seems like proximity blocking either extends the command
> input buffer by several frames, or it shortens a moves recovery.  So if you
> buffer a move during the recovery of another and immediately hold downback,
> the buffered move will only come out if the opponent whiffs a move a range
> that activates proximity blocking.
> I haven't tested it myself though.
>   ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.

Other related posts: