Re: Hello
- From: lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 09:40:57 +0000
thanks sali for your thought provoking e-mail.
let me study ur findings.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 03 April 2017 09:23 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hello
WTF are you even talking about LB?
There are ways to "measure" creativity but they are incomplete.
http://www.senseandsensation.com/2012/03/assessing-creativity.html
Four Ways to Measure
Creativity<http://www.senseandsensation.com/2012/03/assessing-creativity.html>
www.senseandsensation.com
Assessing creative work has been a bugaboo for a good long time. In schools
it's the constant refrain: “How can you grade creative writin...
Shakespeare could have meant something completely different.
Yes, and I've made this argument myself dozens of times. However, the argument
stemmed from how Shakespeare is taught, not his actual work. When you look at
stuff like this think about how Sherlock Holmes evaluates evidence and comes to
a what is in his mind the most probable (or the least improbable) conclusion.
For example, if Shakespeare's suddenly uses a very different structure for a
particular verse, could it be a mistake? Was he just being sloppy? That's a
possibility. But what could the new structure imply in context? An indication
that the character is losing their sanity? What does it sound like when spoken
out loud (these were plays, after all)? How often has he made this "mistake"
before? Does this change in structure add in anyway to the
story/character/plot etc? Again, you will never objectively know the truth,
but their are clues that form a picture that is more likely to be interpreted
in some ways than others. And of course sometimes there is intentional
ambiguity and the material is meant to be interpreted in multiple ways. Now,
on one level this may be really clever and take a lot of talent. On the other
hand, it could also be a really stupid thing to do if it does not add anything.
As for art in terms of painting etc, it is undoubtedly subjective. At the most
basic level, all you need to consider is the differences in how some people see
colour. This automatically has an impact on some level. But that's not
something even worth considering - it's accepted. Yes, a lot of modern art is
considered to be complete rubbish in terms of value, but not inherently because
of the "art" itself (even though that can often also be considered garbage).
If you are simply asking about how to tell a good/bad artist from someone with
good/bad taste, well, that's impossible, because of the same reasons that we
don't have good models for measuring creativity. We can have some sort of
measure of some of its aspects, but it will never be enough. And often, the
"point" of art is to defy those logic systems of evaluation in the first place
(and before you ask, this does not apply to every form of art).
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:23 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Morning peeps,
Similar to what you are lebo were discussing on discord the other day. having
IQ as a metric for intelligence. You mentioned that Shakespeare is a genius and
that ppl been discovering deeper meanings to his works.
SAP khan and I had a discussion when playing gw2 last year some time about this
kinda thing. where you have an artist but then you have interpreters who
interpret his work.
Who decides what is a good artwork? the artist or the interpreter? Similarly to
Shakespeare, he could have meant something completely different, but because
the interpreters found hidden meaning in his works, was that the intention of
Shakespeare in the first place?
This sounds so much like simlkuk tbh. If a lotta knowledgeable ppl come to the
same conclusion then it must be true? isn't that what simulkuk is?
like I can apply that same thing to sf, where someone mught see a cr lk from
Daigo and be like WTF das so clever and Daigo will be thinking to himself, ugh,
I pressed the wrong button.
Sali xplain yoself.
@stu , hammerdin build is the most glass nuclear bomb build ive ever
experienced. wtf. 2 things will happen, you will die, or you will kill
everything.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 02 April 2017 04:03 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<
mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
*lol* Just watch it and decide for yourself Rich :P
On 2 Apr 2017 17:10, "richard moorcroft"
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Wait ,wait,, is this worth it to watch the first episode?? Don't spoil,, how
good is it?
On 02 Apr 2017 14:22, "Ryan Williams"
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Yup. Watched the first ep. Interesting revelations...
On 2 Apr 2017 14:09, "Sameegh Jardine"
<sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
http://kissanime.ru/Anime/Shingeki-no-Kyojin-2nd-Season
Sent from my iPhone
On 02 Apr 2017, at 11:55 AM, richard moorcroft
<greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Are you sure? I have been waiting for ever for this 2nd season,, like 2 years
almost or something like that
On 02 Apr 2017 10:45, "Sameegh Jardine"
<sameegh@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Attack on Titan's second season started yesterday afaik.
On 02 Apr 2017, at 3:21 AM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
"das an iconic nigga"
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<
mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I'm am DYING *LMAO*
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-F1GA17zowI
Other related posts: