In a message dated 10/11/2007 10:51:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
dtennant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
George Richardson's and David Vallerga's comments on Woody's Range of
Collaborative Models are very precise in their description of what, for me,
is vital to the growth of Collaborative Practice: careful attention to
preserving CP as a discipline in itself. I am concerned about presenting it
as one option in a range of models, at least some of which are not
themselves disciplines (such as "cooperative law"-nothing wrong with it at
all, but it is not a discipline nor is it Collaborative)all, but it is not
forward to speaking with you more in Toronto.
Doris Tennant, Esq.
Tennant Lubell, LLC
288 Walnut Street
Suite 500
Newton, MA 02460
617-969-9610, X 101
Fax: 617-969-9611
www.tllawgroup.www
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Alice Dansker Doyle, Esquire
Collaborative Family Law
General Civil Practice
443-520-9690
410-727-9790
www.ADoylelaw.com
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received
this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system. Although this e-mail (including attachments) is believed to
be
free of any virus or other defect that might negatively affect any computer
system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the
recipient to ensure that it is virus free, and no responsibility is accepted
by
the sender for any loss or damage arising in any way in the event that such
a virus or defect exits.
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
