Re: [CollabLaw] Collaborative Law via e-mail
- From: "George B. Richardson" <GeorgeR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Pauline H. Tesler" <pht@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 13:19:29 -0800
At 10:22 AM -0800 1/14/02, Pauline H. Tesler wrote:
I've been using emails as Sherri does, for post-fourway memoranda.
[snip] My own preference is an agreement that post-fourway memos
and scheduling communications can be handled this way, but that
substantive discussions outside the fourway meeting room should not
be initiated in emails [snip]
I agree with Pauline. However, another way email can be used,
cautiously, is for "off-line" communications with your collaborative
counterpart. With [and only with] the agreement of the parties, I and
other counsel may use email and phone communications to discuss a
concern with our counterpart that is not passed directly on to the
client. In such cases, it is very important to label the email as
"confidential" or equivalent.
GeorgeR.
--
<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>:<:>
George B. Richardson 650.324.4801
Certified as a Specialist in Family Law by the
California State Bar Board of Legal Specialization
Other related posts:
