---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ruggiero, Mrs. Ana Lucia (WDC) <ruglucia@xxxxxxxx> Date: 2013/5/15 Subject: [EQ] A statistical procedure to create a neighborhood socioeconomic index for health inequalities analysis To: EQUIDAD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ** ** ** ** *A statistical procedure to create a neighborhood socioeconomic index for health inequalities analysis* Benoît Lalloué1,2,3*, Jean-Marie Monnez3, Cindy Padilla1,2, Wahida Kihal1, Nolwenn Le Meur1,4, Denis Zmirou-Navier1,2,5 and Séverine Deguen1,2**** ** ** 1 EHESP Rennes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Rennes, France**** 2 Inserm, UMR IRSET Institut de recherche sur la santé l’environnement et le travail - Rennes, France**** 3 Lorraine University, Institut Elie Cartan, Lorraine, France**** 4 UMR936 INSERM, Université de Rennes , Rennes, France**** 5 **Lorraine** University, ****Medical School**, **Lorraine**, **France***** *** ** ** *International Journal for Equity in Health – March 2013 * Available online at: http://bit.ly/10pDRfs **** “…..In order to study social health inequalities, contextual (or ecologic) data may constitute an appropriate alternative to individual socioeconomic characteristics. Indices can be used to summarize the multiple dimensions of the neighborhood socioeconomic status. This work proposes a statistical procedure to create a neighborhood socioeconomic index. **** Methods**** The study setting is composed of three French urban areas. Socioeconomic data at the census block scale come from the 1999 census. Successive principal components analyses are used to select variables and create the index. Both metropolitan area-specific and global indices are tested and compared. Socioeconomic categories are drawn with hierarchical clustering as a reference to determine “optimal” thresholds able to create categories along a one-dimensional index. **** Results**** Among the twenty variables finally selected in the index, 15 are common to the three metropolitan areas. The index explains at least 57% of the variance of these variables in each metropolitan area, with a contribution of more than 80% of the 15 common variables. **** Conclusions**** The proposed procedure is statistically justified and robust. It can be applied to multiple geographical areas or socioeconomic variables and provides meaningful information to public health bodies. We highlight the importance of the classification method. We propose an R package in order to use this procedure….” **** *KMC/2013/HSD Twitter* *http://twitter.com/eqpaho* <http://twitter.com/eqpaho> * ** * * This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics; Information Technology - Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues. [DD/ KMC Area] ****Washington** **DC** **USA******** “Materials provided in this electronic list are provided "as is". Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PAHO/WHO Website <http://new.paho.org/equity/> Equity List - Archives - Join/remove: http://listserv.paho.org/Archives/equidad.html *Twitter **http://twitter.com/eqpaho* <http://twitter.com/eqpaho> **** IMPORTANT: This transmission is for use by the intended recipient and it may contain privileged, proprietary or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this transmission to the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or distribute this transmission or take any action in reliance on it. If you received this transmission in error, please dispose of and delete this transmission. Thank you.