[cndcoinerrs]: Are colouring variations varieties?

  • From: "Henry Nienhuis" <vertex4@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <cndcoinerrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 07:39:44 -0400

Hello everyone,
 
If activity at the RCM over that last few years is any indicator, colourized
coins are here to stay and not just as fringe gift-ware products. Even the
mint-state purists amongst us must consider colourized coins as potential
items in our collections.
 
A case in point is the recent release in May of the "Pink Ribbon" 25c piece.
I received one in change the other day which brought this question back to
mind. 
 
As you might know the process in which the ribbon is applied to the coin
does not ensure any particular orientation of the reverse. This means that
there are many possible variations of the placement of the ribbon with
respect to the orientation of the struck design. Although the struck design,
I believe was intentionally symmetric, the designer's initials are a clear
marker for a specific orientation. This marker also corresponds to the
traditional medal alignment of Canadian coins.
 
My question is are these variations in the placement of the ribbon to be
considered as Varieties for this coin? If not, then how do we categorize the
differences? I am including an image to give you a better idea what I am
referring to. (You can see the initials in the lower right).
 
Your opinions are greatly appreciated.
Henry
 

Attachment: 2006 25c rev var.gif
Description: GIF image

Other related posts:

  • » [cndcoinerrs]: Are colouring variations varieties?