[chaoscope] Re: Image
- From: "bob gallagher" <rgallag1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <chaoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 20:27:07 -0400
Nicolas
I buy the bracket suggestion.
But to render 400 million is a bit much for my cpu.
I have no plans to publish any images.
I do this for fun.
If this is unacceptable to you or the general mailing list
please let me know.
I am not an artist, a pure amateur.
Bob G>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chaoscope" <chaoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <chaoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 12:16 PM
Subject: [chaoscope] Re: Image
> Hi Bob, hello all,
>
> First, would you be kind enough to enclose "image" within square brackets
[] in
> your subject line. This rule is absolutely arbitrary but I'd love to see
all
> subscribers comply to it. This goes for Antoni as well. Cheers.
>
> Second, about your image : You *must* raise the default maximum iterations
for
> your renders. It is the first property in the attractor palette. Default
is 20
> millions, which is okay for previews but definitely not okay for images
you wish
> to publish (especially on general fractal mailing-lists).
>
> Here's what your attractor looks like after 400 millions iterations,
Gamma=1.2,
> Opacity=30, Roughness=0.02. Do you see the improvement?
>
> Nicolas Desprez
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
======================================================
The Chaoscope mailing-list
Archives : //www.freelists.org/archives/chaoscope
Admin contact : chaoscope@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web site : http://www.chaoscope.org
======================================================
Other related posts:
