I'd ask some people on another list about the licences used by different toolkits. this seemed to be one of the more complete answers. > To: satlug@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [SATLUG] toolkit licences > Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:02:11 -0500 > > > > does anyone know of a good rundown of the differnt toolkits and their > > licences? > > GTK is pure LGPL > > when KDE first showed up QT was under a non-free license called "QPL" > and is a reason why many developers refused to support KDE. after all > the stink, trolltech changed qt to use a hybrid lgpl/proprietary license > to keep buisnesses paying (http://www.trolltech.com/purchase/orderform.html) > and non-profits (such as kde) to be free-as-in-beer-but-not-speech > > the zend engine (part of php4) still uses the QT toolkits' flawed license. > > tcl/tk uses its own unique license: > > "The authors hereby grant permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, > and license this software and its documentation for any purpose, provided > that existing copyright notices are retained in all copies and that this > notice is included verbatim in any distributions. No written agreement, > license, or royalty fee is required for any of the authorized uses. > Modifications to this software may be copyrighted by their authors > and need not follow the licensing terms described here, provided that > the new terms are clearly indicated on the first page of each file where > they apply." > > > _______________________________________________ > Satlug mailing list > Satlug@xxxxxxxxxx > http://alamo.satlug.org/mailman/listinfo/satlug ===== phrostie Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of DOS and danced the skies on Linux silvered wings. http://pfrostie.freeservers.com/cad-tastrafy/ //www.freelists.org/webpage/cad-linux __________________________________________________ Yahoo! - We Remember 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute